Skip to Content

Elle, Nylon and Pop Sci gladly adopt Apple's subscription terms

Not every publisher's feathers were ruffled by the changes Apple made to its subscription policy earlier this week. While Rhapsody may have responded negatively to the changes, some publishers are accepting the new terms and adopting Apple's new subscription model. According to Advertising Age, three popular magazines, Elle, Nylon and Popular Science, will let customers subscribe via the App Store and, in return, will concede some of their valuable customer data to Apple. The trio believes the advantages of distributing content via Apple's mobile platform outweigh any potential disadvantages.

Nylon is the smallest magazine of the bunch and will be least affected by the loss of customer information. The independent magazine eyes the monetary reward of increased subscriptions and assumes its customers will still provide demographic information via other methods. Popular Science shares a similar approach and may prompt users to share their information after they have purchased a subscription and received their second or third issue of the digital magazine.

Hachette Filipacchi Media U.S., the publisher behind Elle magazine, is taking a wait and see approach. Rather than become enemies with Apple, the magazine is going to adopt the model and see how it turns out. The publisher also sees the model as being very fluid and one that Apple and publishers can modify over time. "I don't think this is something that is set in stone either for us or for Apple. I'd rather work with them to improve it over time than just sit on the sidelines," said Philippe Guelton, Executive Vice President and COO at Hachette Filipacchi Media U.S.



Categories

Software iOS

Not every publisher's feathers were ruffled by the changes Apple made to its subscription policy earlier this week. While Rhapsody may...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

4 Comments

Filter by:
H.

I'm confused. Pop sci will be selling 1 year iPad subscriptions for $19.99, while you get 1 year paper subscription for $12. How is this a good deal for consumers? I thought the terms said they have to sell subscriptions at the same rate on iPad as they do in paper, or am I wrong here?

February 19 2011 at 7:56 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
cinnamonaldehyde

I don't want to rain on the parade, but newspaper and magazine subscriptions are not the same thing as book. It really isn't news (if you think about it) that newspaper and magazine publishers will take the 30% hit. They voluntarily do that, give great prices of the single issue price. This offer saves them paper, printing, and transportation costs.

What isn't news, and should be, is that the 30% rate is being charged on eBooks other than iBooks. There are fixed margins and costs, here. You can't make it up on volume and demographics don't matter. You can't make every book, or a significant additional portion into best sellers by placement or advertising. This could force the wholesale price of books down. The publishers won't take the hit; they'll pass it down to the author in the form of lower royalties and lower advances.

And before you say, well, just read on your iPad, the Kindle still is a better reading experience because it is light, small, works well outdoors, and is relatively cheap, which means you will be willing to read almost anywhere with it. I doubled or tripled my book consumption, i.e., buy, since I bought mine. I don't think book consumption on the iPad is as flexible due to hardware (though it looks good). Being able to read on *both* platforms is key to on-going success of readers and iOS.

Do the math. If the book publisher cut is constant. Apple's cut is 30% of the constant publisher's price and therefore constant. iBook = publisher$ + Apple$. Kindle = publisher$ + Amazon$ + Apple$. Will Amazon willingly take 0% or will they raise the price of Kindle books from their parity of 30% from the publisher, making themselves uncompetitive in their own market.

As an author, one of the little fish, these things worry me. Maybe it will be okay. Maybe in August the Kindle App will re-emerge as an HTML5 application and Apple loses...

February 18 2011 at 1:55 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
David

I've pinged Zinio to see what their commitment is and they said to check back in a month, that they hadn't put together a formal decision. They do offer in app purchases but it doesn't use the App Store. Does anyone have any insight here? I can't imagine they wouldn't come along to the party.

February 18 2011 at 8:54 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to David's comment
Gk

Seeing that Zinio already offers 20% affiliate commissions I don't think it'll be a huge problem for them giving Apple 30%, as they'll probably make up for it in volume.

But maybe the optional personal details bit is a thornier subject...

February 18 2011 at 9:33 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.