Kindergarten iPad 2 program causes rift between parents and school officials in Maine
Recently, the school board in Auburn, Maine decided to launch a pilot program which would place an iPad 2 in the hands of the district's 300 kindergarten students. While school officials hail this program as "a revolution in education," some parents are questioning this decision.
Spearheaded by Tracey Levesque of Auburn, the Auburn Citizens for Responsible Education are mounting an opposition to the school board's iPad 2 program. The group questions the effect of handing iPads to children who are not ready for the technology and objects to the use of taxpayer money to fund this experimental program. Read on for more information about the objections to a program some think is the future of education.
The parent-led group questions the financial merits of the pilot program which will cost the school about US$200,000. This money will be used to equip students and teachers with the necessary iPad hardware and training to deploy these devices in the classroom. Auburn Superintendent Tom Morrill is seeking grants for this program, but will take the money from the school budget if a source of alternative funds cannot be found. The group also criticizes the school board's decision which was made without supporting research or public debate.
Besides financial concerns the parent group questions the rationale for giving children an electronic device like the iPad in the classroom. The group points out that children get adequate screen time at home and don't need another tool to zone out on in the classroom.
Levesque is also concerned that attempts at teacher-directed instruction will be lost when an iPad is placed in the hands of a five-year old. "If my teacher is talking to me and I have an iPad, I'm going to completely tune her out, tune out my surroundings, because I just got this thing."
She and others assert children need face-to-face interaction and the fine motor skills development that comes from hands-on activities and creative instruction. The group plans to argue its case against the iPad 2 at an upcoming School Committee meeting to be held Wednesday, April 27.
For a different (positive) perspective on iPads in primary education, be sure to check out Mac developer & school IT director Fraser Spiers' blog.
Share
Categories
Recently, the school board in Auburn, Maine decided to launch a pilot program which would place an iPad 2 in the hands of the district's...
Add a Comment
What is wrong with these people?? Children today need LESS screen time NOT more. What is the possible benefit from encouraging them to spend even more time with an electronic device. This makes me so sad - this is a crucial age for social development and that should be the focus. I could almost understand this if they were talking about high school age students. A very wise person once said, "Just because you can do it, doesn't mean you should."
May 25 2011 at 5:43 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Replygood for children they will definetly tell there parents to buy one for them after they go to home :P
step by step guide to jailbreak your iphone n more
http://www.xionsms.com/2011/04/jailbreak-iphone-4-and-iphone-3gs-using.html
These are kindergarten aged kids. I don't believe they need a virtual experience. Far from it.
At this age they need hands on tactile interpersonal development: they need to develop social skills through play with classmates, they need to develop their own sense of self and environment through hands on activity with real objects, they need to develop their capacity to listen and comprehend through story telling and music, and parents and teachers need to nurture in these children their sense of security to provide a space for exploration and growth. These are not imperatives secured with an iPad.
Planting the roots to develop imagination, effort, focus, collaboration, problem solving and empathyâthis is the promise of kindergarten. Not apps. Not even reading I dare say (there is much evidence that points to the benefits of teaching reading as late as 3rd grade).
The argument that these kids need a computers to be trained for the the future is bunk. By the time these kids are out in the work force in earnest â 15 to 20 years from now â neither an iPad, or any computer of today will be the norm.
I am all for giving kids the tools to fully develop their potential, and technology has an important role in this. But using technology for technology's sake is misleading and counter productive. Oh... and a waste of money.
I think these kids would be better served if the school took that $200,000 and hired foreign language instructors. Mandarin anyone?
Sadly, some people just look for an excuse to complain. Finding none more worthy, they take what they can get.
April 25 2011 at 10:05 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyRelax mr Hater! Actually my comment was not based upon the idea of excluding these parents, just outvoting them and preventing their backward ideas from prevailing.
You seem to easily equate opposition to the anti technology parents with denying them an opportunity to be heard. They are not the same.
I teach kindergarten. My 2nd career. My first was as a software engineer, some 15 years. I have serious reservations about how we are pushing developmentally inappropriate instruction into kindergarten. Including technology. I'm considering a doctoral degree and am very interested in researching technology and early childhood development. Let's not be so rushed, until we know more.
If you look at the financial reasons, they may be buying these in place of laptops. They can save an enormous amount of money this way. I normally here the opposite. Schools are buying these partially to save money.
The screen reason is just ridiculous. If they don't want more "screen" time at school because they already have too much at home then maybe they should spend less "screen" time at home. The biggest argument for too much screen time is not enough exercise. I guess they thing the kids should be exercising in class instead. Everything I have heard says that iPads can make students more engaged not less. The "tune out" comment makes absolutely no sense.
Kids of that age tend to drop things. How long do you think an iPad will last in the hands of a kindergarden kid? Hours? Heck, even adults tend to ruin iPads by dropping them.
How in the world can the school justify the cost? If there are 20 students and we guess $400 per iPad, that's 8,000. certainly the school could find better use for that much money.
It sounds like you have no idea how much a school actually spend. Dropping is not a significant cost here.
Learning is an interactive process. Anything that can enhance that interactively is a good thing. iPads also replace or reduce the need for laptops and other more expensive computers. They reduce school IT costs. From a financial standpoint these devices are great.
@4nNtt iPads may indeed be an ideal replacement for laptops and even some texts, but.... These are kindergarten kids. 5 year olds! They don't have laptops to replace. This would be a significant NEW expense.
April 26 2011 at 2:50 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyThis is just noise. The future of the classroom is not iPads, the future of the classroom is NO classroom. Maybe not in kindergarten, but when you see websites like Kahn Academy doing a better job of teaching math to high schoolers than classroom teachers, it makes me wonder why not use the web to learn from the best, rather than sleep though a boring lecture from an average teacher.
April 24 2011 at 3:09 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyThe future is probably public charter schools. Then you can choose what is best for your child (including web based education).
April 24 2011 at 8:59 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyWell, if the parents protest just move the program to another school and let them see the benefits and what they missed out on. There is little need to debate here. Obviously the parents don't like the idea!!! Once they see other children learning and enjoying the iPad they will realize what IDIOTS they were and how they missed out, then, they can fund iPads out of their pockets. Dumb parents shouldn't have smart children, it is just a waste. They could have devised a workable program that could have been beneficial to all....WOW!!! The children are smart enough for the iPad but the parents are NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!
April 24 2011 at 2:24 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyDeals of the Day
more deals- Apple iPhone 4 8GB for Verizon, AT&T, or Sprint for $50 + pickup at Best Buy
- Unlocked iPhone 4S 16GB for GSM (AT&T, T-Mobile) for $619 + free shipping
- Apple iMac Core i7 Quad 3.4GHz 27" w/ 24GB RAM, 2TB HDD for $2,677 + $29 s&h
- Used Apple Magic Mouse for $36 + $4 s&h
- 9-Piece iPhone Bundle, includes 1,900mAh battery for $8 + free shipping
- Skullcandy Riot Earbud Headphones for $10 + free shipping
78 Comments