Skip to Content

Google's cloud music service to launch without iOS support

According to CNET, Google will unveil its cloud music service, Music Beta, at the I/O Developer Conference. The free service will be invitation-only (and US-only) at launch, and it will allow users to upload up to 20,000 songs onto Google's servers and stream that music to many web-connected devices.

If all that sounds good to you, here's the monkey wrench: the service won't work on iOS devices, because Google has (perhaps deliberately) hobbled it by requiring support for Flash Player. While this means the service will work on PCs, Macs and some Android devices, any iPhone, iPod touch or iPad owners will be forced to use alternative services, like Amazon's Cloud Player or Apple's presumably forthcoming "iCloud" service.

Like Amazon, Google hasn't secured licensing deals with the major music labels before launching its music streaming service. Unlike Amazon, Google doesn't have its own music store to assist in monetizing that service, and by choosing to utilize Flash in its implementation, Google's also shut out over 100 million potential mobile users from Music Beta. Google, of course, has a "convenient" answer for any iOS users wanting to use Music Beta -- buy an Android device -- but those of us who are unwilling to do so will either flock to Amazon's service or hope that Apple comes out with something superior.



Categories

iPhone iOS

According to CNET, Google will unveil its cloud music service, Music Beta, at the I/O Developer Conference. The free service will be...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

41 Comments

Filter by:
SK8

Without supporting iOS devices!? Is this service a joke?!

..... but this actually make sense, Google is a hypocrite, never doubt about it.

Apple is going to release their cloud music service soon, so fxxk it Goo!!!

May 10 2011 at 1:56 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
James

Until all of apples services are available on google devices, please stop crying every time google releases products that aren't available on apple devices. Thanks!

May 10 2011 at 10:35 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Andrew

Wow so anyone using their service on a portable device will get less then half the battery of usual fail.

May 10 2011 at 10:23 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to Andrew's comment
Mark

Depends if these newcomers allow offline playlists or not. Spotify does, so you are not streaming music on the move, you are playing it locally, hence very little battery usage.

Prediction: Apple will purchase or enter into a strategic partnership / Joint Venture with Spotify in 2011 and all of these other minor players in music streaming (Google, Amazon etc) will withdraw their services within 2 years.

May 10 2011 at 2:28 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Andrew

cool thanks for the info I was unaware of that.

May 10 2011 at 5:20 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
xsilverhammer

i wonder how many people needs to get access to a 20k-song music lib anytime of the day.

May 10 2011 at 9:00 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to xsilverhammer's comment
Josh

It's not about being able to listen to that much music at once. It's about being able to listen to the exact ones I want whenever the mood strikes.

I don't want the hassle, limited capability and quality of streaming from the cloud though. That's what my iPod Classic is for.

May 10 2011 at 11:45 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
robogobo

one major problem that Google, Amazon and Apple aren't facing up to is that the infrastructure can't handle cloud streaming services yet. It's really quite ridiculous when you imagine that the people who really want all their music at their disposal at once, are the ones who listen to it all day long. And the obvious limitations are 1) spotty bandwidth via 3G/4G service providers and 2) batteries can't handle 3G/4G connections for very long, especially while running flash at the same time. I predict the cloud services will fail slowly, though, which will only delay the realization that we need cheaper and larger flash memory instead. Too bad.

Oh, and uploading all my music? no way. Why not just bring back Simplify and let me stream from my own cloud at home?

May 10 2011 at 7:46 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
HD

Bad move... :/

May 10 2011 at 7:41 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
stol

This is funny. We've spent time & money downloading and ripping music, now it is proposed that we upload it again in order to stream it over the internet.

This is kinda absurd. How many people really need over, say, 8GB of music on the go? Why don't these people get an iPod classic anyway?
How will this streaming service perform on a moving car, in the subway, on an airplane, in a trip in the country or the mountains? If you want to stream something, why not online radio? There are quite a few good ones.
I sometimes feel we are pushed to have non-existing needs that are deployed on a sub-par infrastructure. We get overcharged for data over congested 3G networks and now we are supposed to stream music over it too?
Get iTunes to sync automatically when you connect your device (and disable automatic backups), make some smart playlists and from there it's just pluging a cord to your iThing. Plex & Zumocast for streaming from your computer - if you have it on when away (mine sleeps usually…).

Upload my music to Google so it can further analyze my taste and stream it from there? Meh!

May 10 2011 at 6:15 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
5 replies to stol's comment
jigme

i still don't understand this whole cloud music-streaming deal: surely the current infrastructure, with our tiny monthly data caps and huge contention just couldn't handle any kind of serious music listening (say a couple or more hours a day, at an acceptable quality/rate like 256K/s?)

all these cloud services being rolled out - but where's the bandwidth for them?

or am i missing something?

May 10 2011 at 4:26 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to jigme's comment
Mark

50mps connection with Virgin and no real usage limit - no problem here in the UK. Those people who haven't tried Spotify or similar services are not really in a position to comment.

May 10 2011 at 2:11 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
robbiejf

I've been using Spotify here in Australia for some months now - on my Sonos S5, iPhone, iPad, iMac and MBP. All of these supposed alternative offerings seem somewhat meh and decidedly 2nd rate in comparison.

May 10 2011 at 3:37 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Avenged110

Sounds like Google is run bya bunch of marketing douche bags. So be it, Google. I'll take my Apple elsewhere...

(Disclaimer: I hate google for everything but Gmail, voice, maps, and search)

May 10 2011 at 3:16 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.