Nuance-like Apple speech recognition patent emerges

Rumors have been flying that Apple has entered into some kind of agreement with speech recognition company Nuance. Now Patently Apple has published an Apple patent that shows a possible use for Nuance's technology in the iPhone.
The patent covers text-to-speech and speech-to-text conversion. In the patent, Apple lists two ways it might be hard for someone to answer their phone in the usual way: communicating in noisy environments and being unable to communicate during a meeting. In the first situation Apple says the user might try shouting to overcome the noise, but shouting frequently renders the voice signal unintelligible. Likewise in a quiet environment, such as a meeting where the user doesn't want to disrupt what's going on around him, he might try whispering into his phone, but again whispering frequently renders the voice signal unintelligible.
Apple proposes to get around these limitations by running text-to-speech and speech-to-text conversion on the fly. Instead of shouting or whispering into the phone in a noise or quiet environment, respectively, the user could type a text message while live on the call and it would be read aloud to the person on the other end of the line.
Share
Rumors have been flying that Apple has entered into some kind of agreement with speech recognition company Nuance. Now Patently Apple...
Add a Comment
Someone needs to tell Uncle Steve that a technology for communicating in noisy/quiet environments already exists - it's called SMS...
May 15 2011 at 2:22 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyOoh, you mean like how we didn't need cell phones because we already had landlines? You must ride a horse rather than drive a car. Unimaginative people stand in the way of future innovation.
May 16 2011 at 9:00 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI dont want to jump the gun and start an argument over a feature that hasn't even been announced by Apple yet. The final service might have more to it than is described here. But to reply to your line of reasoning, landlines and mobile phones don't serve the same purpose - cell phones allow us to continue talking on the phone even when we are away from home - so suggesting that they are supplementary is stupid. Please explain to me how this is more convenient than SMS. I would imagine that if I called someone who was using text-to-speech conversion I would just have to hold the phone to my ear while I waited for him to type out his message. Of course, if this feature was an add-on to the native SMS app - reading my text messages out to me or allowing me to dictate my text messages it would probably make a lot more sense.
May 16 2011 at 12:04 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyThe Babel Fish is coming. I am certain. 5 to 8 years from now.
May 14 2011 at 7:54 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyDeals of the Day
more deals- Apple iPhone 4 8GB for Verizon, AT&T, or Sprint for $50 + pickup at Best Buy
- Unlocked iPhone 4S 16GB for GSM (AT&T, T-Mobile) for $619 + free shipping
- Apple iMac Core i7 Quad 3.4GHz 27" w/ 24GB RAM, 2TB HDD for $2,677 + $29 s&h
- Used Apple Magic Mouse for $36 + $4 s&h
- 9-Piece iPhone Bundle, includes 1,900mAh battery for $8 + free shipping
- Skullcandy Riot Earbud Headphones for $10 + free shipping
4 Comments