Back to Mobile View

Skip to Content

Blurrycam Theatre Presents: The i(have too much free time)Phone 5

Usually, tipsters looking to prank us with a faked shot of an unreleased Apple product will send us something like the fake iPod classic we saw a few months ago. You know, the classic Blurrycam shot, where it's obvious that A) the tipster has no idea how to use his camera's focus, and B) also has no idea how to use Photoshop.

But today's subject went above and beyond. First off, he didn't stop at sending us a single image of a faked iPhone 5 -- he sent us a full-fledged video. The purported story behind this video is that Apple fouled up somehow and managed to accidentally include a hidden link to the iPhone 5 on its Swiss website. Ludicrous? Absolutely. But if you suspend disbelief for a bit and watch anyway, the video shows our tipster navigating through this secret site, flicking through galleries of a quite convincing-looking iPhone 5 and even a comprehensive tech specs page. The whole thing looks like a lot of effort went into it, with near-professional quality renders of the supposed iPhone 5. Frankly, it's the best fake I've ever seen -- and it was good enough to hoodwink some other sites that have posted it as a legitimate leak.

A good fake, however, remains a fake; there are several clues to the faux-ness throughout the video, and they aren't exactly hard to find. First off, check out the URL in the address bar during the opening split second of the video.

Busted.

Rather than a standard http:// address, the video kicks off with a file:// prefix -- meaning the browsing wasn't of a website hosted on a server, but instead a collection of local files on Peter's desktop. This is an immediate tipoff that the whole thing is fake. All our tipster had to do was edit out this one second of video, and he might not have burnt all his credibility from the word "Go." (And I'm sure it's a total coincidence that the first person to send this video to us was named Peter.)

Any other clues this video might be fake? Oh yeah. There's the random string of characters between www.apple.com/chde and iphone5 in the URL -- the current Swiss site for the iPhone 4 is a simple www.apple.com/chde/iphone. There's clumsy typesetting on the iPhone 5 logo. The "hero" images don't autoscroll the way they do on Apple's real site. The gallery's background is grey instead of black. Screenshots of the phone show "No Service" in the status bar -- a great way to advertise a mobile phone, right? The time in the status bar reads 8:07 AM rather than Apple's traditional 9:41. Battery percentage is showing, too, which Apple doesn't show off in its product shots.

The forehead-slapping "duh" moment comes in when you see that all of the apps in the gallery shots have English names... on a Swiss site. Oops.

The iPhone 5. iPhone without the phone. This changes everything.

Peter really went overboard on his tech specs page, with what looks to be carefully-calculated dimensions for an iPhone 5 with a 4.2-inch touchscreen at 275 ppi. The camera has been upgraded to 8 megapixels and 1080p video, and capacity is bumped to 32 or 64 GB. In all, it's a laundry list based off all the rumors we've heard so far, but it falls flat on at least one detail. The tech specs on Peter's page list iTunes 9.2 as the minimum required version for the iPhone 5, and we know full well that iTunes 10.5 will be the earliest version of iTunes that iOS 5 will support. Also, he's missing photos and descriptions of the top and bottom ends of the supposed iPhone 5; I guess he just forgot those?

The thing is, I actually like Peter's renders of the iPhone 5 -- I'd be neither surprised nor sad if the device looks similar to them -- but trying to pass this off as a "leak" is what's prompted me to poke fun at him. If he'd sent us these pics and said something like, "Hey, check out my iPhone 5 renders, do you think they're pretty close?" we might have taken him more seriously. But trying to put one over on us (and the rest of the Apple-centric web) this way gets you inducted into the Blurrycam Hall of Shame. We hope that publishing this rundown means our more easily misled readers will stop sending us his video as a tip.



Categories

iPhone

Usually, tipsters looking to prank us with a faked shot of an unreleased Apple product will send us something like the fake iPod...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

29 Comments

Filter by:
Uggi Kaldan

Why dont you just admit he had you going for a while - and if had sent in the video stating :: This is my Iphone 5 renders you would never have made this article.

Most likely "Peter" is an apple affiliate releasing early designs for the Iphone 5, creating this sort of hype, that gives Apple SO much free advertising... perhaps the best marketing plan ever conceived.

August 17 2011 at 3:52 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Stumpy

Why on earth would you write an article about a video and NOT LINK TO THE VIDEO?!?!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxYnuHX3LCI&feature=player_embedded

August 11 2011 at 12:02 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mr Elwood

Quoting the article: "all of the apps in the gallery shots have English names... on a Swiss site. Oops."

Official Finnish Apple site also has English app names. Oops?
http://www.apple.com/fi/iphone/

August 10 2011 at 10:11 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
BK

For me, the tipoff was the prominence of the iPhone 3GS in the footer. The No Service sealed the deal. All the other stuff was pretty impressive, though. Nice job, Peter. You're now a certified douche.

August 10 2011 at 10:01 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Doug Newton

I like this render, shame its a fake but i could totally see it being close to the real thing. as for the amount of time this guy "wasted" i know from my experience that its fun to do things like this, I've created eBooks from scratch from stories i find on the web, i also do the cover art for them, I've created album art for albums that iTunes doesn't recognize and who's pics on Google are low res or blurry or non existent, I've also made products "renders" for my (at the moment) imaginary company. i do all that in my free time because i enjoy it, but unlike this guy I've never sent anything in, not even the eBooks to the author, (the eBooks are just some good stories i found online that have each chapter uploaded as they are written and i update the eBooks accordingly) i mean i'd like too but i don't know if he'd be willing to accept that kind of help so I'm content with just creating them so i can read it on my iPhone and nook with proper chapters and a cover and all that stuff lol so my point is don't hate on the guy just cause he made something of quality that apple probably pays thousands/millions for for free, the only thing he did wrong was lie about it but hey if i had done something that good I'd be proud of it and want to show it off and what he did got a lot of attention so i guess he succeeded, good for him :D

August 10 2011 at 1:28 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Doug Newton's comment
God

tldr

August 10 2011 at 4:31 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
glenurse

check out this douche post
from London town

http://london.craigslist.co.uk/mob/2505306146.html

August 10 2011 at 12:58 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to glenurse's comment
LFK1236

Lol xD

August 11 2011 at 11:20 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
robogobo

Plus google didn't cache it.

August 10 2011 at 9:18 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ninapaulino10

Android all the way. Iphone is nice but too simplistic for me. I have rooted every android decvice I've owned. I like flashing roms and having full control over my device http://bit.ly/r5oZ92

August 10 2011 at 1:31 AM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to ninapaulino10's comment
Tag12171

Isnt that what jailbreaking is for. Why are you here anyways if you're a fandroid? Not that that's a bad thing.

August 10 2011 at 2:41 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Adrian von Gegerfelt

I wouldn't be happy with my phone if I HAD to "flash roms" on it.

August 10 2011 at 5:22 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Alex Paris

wheres the video?

August 10 2011 at 1:24 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Oscar Goldman

What would be believable here is that Apple would make a phone way thiinner and do nothing about its sorry battery life.

Apple has a long history of making products pointlessly thinner (at no one's request) instead of using increased miniaturization to increase battery volume. Heaven forbid Apple increase the USEFULNESS of its products.

August 10 2011 at 12:22 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.