Back to Mobile View

Skip to Content

Gizmodo won't be charged in iPhone 4 case

Gawker Media has issued a statement saying that the District Attorney of San Mateo County will not be pursuing charges against Gizmodo nor Jason Chen, Gizmodo's editor, over the leak of the iPhone 4 in April 2010. A prototype of the iPhone 4 was reportedly found in a bar in Redwood City, California, in March 2010 and sold to Gizmodo, who then took it apart, confirmed it was indeed the upcoming iPhone 4 and showed it to the world. Needless to say, wackiness ensued. You can see all the events that played out on this handy flow chart.

Today's statement by the San Mateo Country DA said that, while no charges were being filed against any employee of Gizmodo, the DA "has filed misdemeanor charges against two individuals for the misappropriation of an iPhone 4 prototype that was lost by an Apple employee and subsequently recovered in a Redwood City establishment by the defendants on March 25, 2010. Brian Hogan, 22, of Redwood City, was charged with one count of misappropriation of lost property, and Sage Wallower, 28, of Emeryville, was charged with misappropriation of lost property, and possession of stolen property." Their arraignment is scheduled for August 25.

Gawker Media replied with the statement:

We are pleased that the District Attorney of San Mateo County, Steven Wagstaffe, has decided, upon review of all of the evidence, that no crime was committed by the Gizmodo team in relation to its reporting on the iPhone 4 prototype last year. While we have always believed that we were acting fully within the law, it has inevitably been stressful for the editor concerned, Jason Chen, and we are glad that we can finally put this matter behind us.

They might be off the hook, but something tells me Gizmodo still isn't going to be invited to any Apple press events for a long time to come.



Categories

iPhone

Gawker Media has issued a statement saying that the District Attorney of San Mateo County will not be pursuing charges against Gizmodo...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

8 Comments

Filter by:
Kelmon

That's a shame - I really wanted to see Mr. Chen charged for something in this story. In some respects I'm not that bothered that they knowingly purchased stolen property and profited from it, although I probably should be. Rather, I'm angry with Gizmodo and Chen because they publicly humiliated the unfortunate engineer when there was absolutely no need to. Acting like children afterwards did not endear themselves to me either.

August 11 2011 at 8:04 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
AppleZilla

Who reads their regurgitated garbage. Gawker has like ten blogs, but crossposts so much, that it's like 1.5 blogs worth of content. Gizmodo is the worst. Tech 'news' for ten year olds, written by ten year olds.

I can't believe they're still around.

August 10 2011 at 8:10 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
gilesshine

Gizmodo lost me when they quit acting like journalists and acted like teen age punks. They could have still had their scoop and maintained credibility by acting professional. I haven't clicked on a link I knew would take me to a Gizmodo story since.

August 10 2011 at 6:54 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Michael Murdock

What's amazing is that the release said that they were charged with something and yet Gawker media decides to spin it the opposite direction. I can pretty much say that they're not going to get the welcome mat from Apple anytime soon for any reason. You don't steal from the Big House and expect to be welcomed back. If you do, you need your head seriously examined.

August 10 2011 at 5:53 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
Christian

This disappoints me, because it tells Gawker that they can get away with acting like *********. I wanted to see Lam and Chen strung up by the DA, and Nick Denton right along with them. As it is, they’ll gloat about this and Denton will post some *******-ish tweet about it within a day.

And no, the irony of writing this complaint on an AOL-owned weblog is not lost on me.

August 10 2011 at 3:57 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Christian's comment
Yuusharo

Really? So having an exclusive report for a journalist is worth getting "strung up" these days? You can argue whether it was ethical to pay for the phone, but frankly, a journalist has every right to report and publish the facts of a story, and baby, did they have one hell of a scoop last year.

It was criminal to steal the phone. It was criminal to sell property that didn't belong to you. It is *NOT* a crime to report on that item. Once we start criminalizing journalists for uncovering stories a company's PR department, or even a government, doesn't want you to know about, we've lost one of the fundamental principles that are the foundation of our country and our culture.

Sorry so sounding so preachy, but our right to a free press is critical to our society. Apple not wanting us to know about an upcoming device isn't above that, if you can believe it.

August 10 2011 at 4:37 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Yuusharo's comment
sip

@Yuusharo: "It was criminal to steal the phone. It was criminal to sell property that didn't belong to you. It is *NOT* a crime to report on that item."

You forgot to say:

It is a crime to buy or take possession of stolen property.

August 10 2011 at 5:17 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down
Katalina

Did they give up their source?

August 10 2011 at 3:49 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.