Back to Mobile View

Skip to Content

Why Siri should (and probably will) come to iPad 2

Since the iPhone 4S features the same A5 processor as the iPad 2, owners of Apple's current-gen tablet have wondered if it's possible that Siri, Apple's new voice assistant, might be offered on the iPad 2. While my colleague Erica Sadun's answer to that is "Don't hold your breath," I only agree with her up to a point: I don't think there are any technical hurdles whatsoever to running Siri on an iPad 2, and the fact that the device doesn't currently feature voice controls is meaningless. I think Siri will come to the iPad 2 eventually -- certainly not right away, but possibly within the next six months.

Voice Control as it now exists on the iPhone 3GS and iPhone 4 doesn't function on the iPad or iPad 2, but there's a reason for that: the existing commands would be essentially useless on those devices. The pre-Siri version of Voice Control allows you to use voice commands to control music playback, dial phone numbers or initiate FaceTime calls, and ask the device for information about the current time or currently playing song. That's about all Voice Control does. Those functions are all useful features on a device that spends much of its time in your pocket, but on an iPad they make very little sense.

On the other hand, Siri's commands would be immensely useful on the iPad. The same things Apple showed off at the "Let's talk iPhone" event, like setting up Reminders and Calendar events or looking up information on Wikipedia or Wolfram Alpha, would be very handy to have -- so handy that I don't see why Apple wouldn't offer them. Apple has long been a company that designs products its own workers want to use, and it's hard to imagine that no one in Cupertino has thought about how Siri could vastly expand the power and capability of the iPad 2.

Since the iPad 2 has both a microphone and the same A5 as the iPhone 4S, there shouldn't be any technical reason why Siri wouldn't function well on that device. Some have speculated that the iPhone 4S has 1 GB of RAM to the iPad 2's 512 MB (a claim that will have to wait for an iFixit teardown before it can be proven or disproven), but my TUAW colleagues don't believe that Siri's functions should be so RAM-intensive that they require such massive amounts of memory.

In fact, we've done some digging into Siri and found that most of the actual work of understanding voice commands gets offloaded to external servers. In essence, the iPhone 4S and its built-in processing functions determine what you said, while Apple's servers translate that into what you meant and send that information back to your iPhone. The pre-processing that takes place on the device itself may be too taxing for an A4 processor, but the iPad 2's A5 should theoretically be able to handle it just fine. Perhaps even better -- Apple has a habit of underclocking CPUs for the iPhone in the interest of power management, so the iPad 2's A5 is likely to outperform that of the iPhone 4S for many functions.

The fact that Apple hasn't yet said one way or another whether Siri will come to devices other than the iPhone 4S also doesn't mean much. The iPhone 4, 3GS, and newer iPod touch models had an exclusive on multitasking for almost exactly six months before iOS 4.2 debuted and brought that feature to the iPad, and the same thing may end up being true for Siri.

Here's what I think is the most likely scenario: Siri will remain an iPhone 4S exclusive at least until the third tier of international rollouts completes in December. In fact, Apple will probably wait until after the end of the holiday quarter and bring Siri to the iPad 2 in the first quarter of 2012. Not only will this give market incentive for people to buy the iPhone 4S by having Siri as a device-exclusive feature during the holiday period, it'll also give Apple's servers and Siri's algorithms time to adjust and scale to the number of inquiries it'll receive.

Once Siri's beta period ends and international rollouts for the iPhone 4S are reasonably complete, that's the perfect time to bring Siri to the iPad 2 in a dot-update to iOS 5. By that time Siri and its supporting infrastructure will be more mature and able to handle the extra load of adding support for one more device type, and it should also help alleviate the typical post-holiday quarter sales slump.

As for the other devices in Apple's iOS stable, like the iPod touch, iPhone 4, and iPhone 3GS, I don't expect them to ever see support for Siri. Siri's developers have already confirmed that many compromises were required to get the service running on the iPhone 3GS, and it's probably the same story for iOS devices with an A4 processor. The 2012 model iPod touch will likely be updated to an A5 processor, however, so we might see Siri support for next year's iPod touch.

For the time being, Siri remains an iPhone 4S exclusive and one we have yet to test for ourselves. We look forward to putting this innovative feature under our interrogation lights once the iPhone 4S is released on October 14.



Categories

iPhone iPad

Since the iPhone 4S features the same A5 processor as the iPad 2, owners of Apple's current-gen tablet have wondered if it's possible that...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

52 Comments

Filter by:
iiSaintsGirl

IPad update to get Siri is on January 7 so look for that update!

December 21 2011 at 3:22 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Joe Mommie

vlingo works pretty well, doesnt have all the features of SIRI but I dont see why within the next several months it wont be on ipad2...i bet it will once jail broken! I will surely jailbreak if thats the case...btw iphone 4s has 512mb of ram...

October 19 2011 at 11:40 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
daewootech

I thouht it was just exclusive at first only to the 4s just so they could give a reason to get the 4s over the 4?

October 10 2011 at 3:41 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Tom Coady

The voice recognition part already exists on iPad with the dragon dictation app. This works insanely well, but requires a network connection and can only do about 30 seconds at a time. Assuming the voice isn't compressed, I can't see how this would need any special hardware.

October 10 2011 at 3:18 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Morac

Considering voice control currently works on the iPod Touch and not the iPad, that throws out the "existing commands would be essentially useless on those devices" argument since the iPod Touch doesn't function as a phone either.

You're right that there's no technical reason Siri couldn't be added to the iPad 2, but I don't think it will. I'd like to be wrong, but considering Apple seems to treat the iPad differently (no utility apps (clock, calculator, notepad, etc and no voice control) I don't see it happening.

October 09 2011 at 6:21 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Chayuth Pirotesak

When it comes to Apple, many analysts seems to lost their track ...

Apple philosophy: just because that feature is cool and supporting technology exists does not mean Apple will put that feature on a device.

iPad is different device with iPhone. Most people who use iPad always make use of its large screen i.e. hold it up when use, in contrast with iPhone, which they can put it in their pocket and utilize the voice function.

One would argue that someone will put an iPad down e.g. in a car, but that's minority and does Apple seems to support minority so far? No.

Given only this reason is enough not to see Siri on any iPad ever, no matter iPad 10 or what.

October 09 2011 at 8:28 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Chayuth Pirotesak's comment
dorjesyber

This feels like the argument that was made against putting a camera on the iPad. Apple doesn't even know what people really can use the iPad for. I can think of several cases where I'd put my iPad down and would benefit from voice control.

An "appliance" use would be in the kitchen as digital cookbook and timer.

User: Okay Siri lets make some cookies.
S: From your last stopping list you can make these kinds of cookies (list of cookies). Are there any other ingredients available?
U: No. Lets make Chocolate Chip.
S: Here is the recipe you like
U: In go the butter, suger.....
S: *cross out ingredients* Ding Ding! Don't forget the one-half tablespoon of salt.
U: Thank you Siri
S: I am at your service.
U: In the oven it goes. Siri set the timer.
S: Baking, your cookies will be ready in 10 minutes.

There, a hypothetical use hands free cooking aid. On iPad it can be strategically placed to still offer full screen instructions for various stages in more complex dishes. Siri tracks your through the process and changes the display for you, gives audible reminders, and even tracks multiple timers.

I don't think Beta Siri is up to something this complex, but this is an example of a task where the iPad with Siri would trump the iPhone.

October 17 2011 at 4:45 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
whatchadoin

What if it was something trivial like the Siri GUI for iPad's larger screen is not complete, they did say its beta. Anyway, Siri on iPad 2 would be way cool.

October 09 2011 at 8:06 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Michael

I guess you're not as fond of music as the rest of us. Why would you think that playing music and manipulating other basic functions by voice would not be desirable on iPad 2?

I doubt we will see Siri on iPad 2 regardless of whether or not your "colleauges" believe it is technically achievable. As new innovations become fewer and farther between, Apple must keep at least a few compelling upgrades standing by for the next big thing — Siri will be your compelling reason (or at least one of them) to upgrade to Pad 3.

Personally — I think RAM requirements could be feasible reason for holding back Siri on iPad 2, and I would be cautious of any self proclaimed experts who claim to have any worthwhile grasp what Siris requirements really are, at least until Apple volunteer more information.

October 09 2011 at 7:35 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
chasmo@mac.com

And possibly even better come to the new AppleTV. No more remote, that would be one of his(Steve Jobs) dreams.

October 09 2011 at 6:55 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Sam Hutchings

Are we all forgetting that Siri REQUIRES a data connection, something that cannot be guaranteed on an iPad? The iPhone 4S is a mobile phone, so has a data connection wherever it is physically possible (pretty much), something that is not the case for an iPad Wi-Fi, and therefore would give a very inconsistent end user experience

October 09 2011 at 6:43 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Sam Hutchings's comment
Chataupiano

why should that matter? no one is forcing you to use Siri when you don't have a data connection

October 14 2011 at 8:52 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.