Back to Mobile View

Skip to Content

Apple takes on porn sites in domain name dispute

Apple has filed a complaint with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) against seven domain names featuring the word iPhone that forward to mobile porn sites -- including one site called iPhone4s.com.

The latter is especially worrisome, since it matches the name of Apple's new and best-selling handset. The iPhone4s.com site was registered in August of 2008, well before the unveiling of the iPhone 4S in October of 2011. Apple owns domains for iPhone4.com, but iPhone3GS and iPhone 3G are actually non-Apple sites.

Some of the other domains targeted in the WIPO complaint include iphonecamforce.com, iphonecam4s, and porn4iphones. All are hardcore sites that Apple does not wish to be associated with, plus they use Apple's product name in the domain name. Apple has used WIPO successfully in domain name disputes, most recently when the organization ordered the owners of iPods.com to transfer the domain name to Apple.

Apple doesn't always resort to WIPO in these situations. Last year, they spent a rumored US$4.5 million to purchase the domain iCloud.com from Swedish cloud computing firm Xcerion. But in this case, the company obviously doesn't want potential customers to get a surprise when they're just looking for information about iPhones, so they're going to WIPO for satisfaction.



Categories

Apple iPhone

Apple has filed a complaint with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) against seven domain names featuring the word iPhone that forward to mobile porn sites
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

2 Comments

Filter by:
Maccles

The iCloud domain is a completely different kettle of fish to these other sites.

It was a legitimate enterprise that was registered long before Apple came up with the idea of having a cloud service and calling it iCloud. Apple made an offer to buy the rights to the name and it was accepted at a negotiated price. If it had been refused then Apple would have had no recourse to WIPO and would have had to come up with a different name.

In the same way Apple cannot call the Apple TV an iTV, because this name is owned by the ITV network. Steve Jobs asked ITV if Apple could buy the name and ITV said no - end of story.

November 03 2011 at 3:33 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Maccles's comment
AhmedI

I'm just surprised that it never occurred to Apple to call it the "iWatch" or "iTube" instead. . . .

November 06 2011 at 4:37 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.