Back to Mobile View

Skip to Content

Mind-controlled Siri likely a hoax

Remember last week's TUAW post about the Project Black Mirror guys who were doing the research into a mind-controlled iPhone 4S using an Arduino microcontroller, some ECG pads to pick up the brain waves, and voice synthesis software? Well, it appears that despite the impressive video, the entire thing may be a hoax.

The Verge is reporting that a company that does real research into thought control of devices has posted a blog entry debunking the setup. For the first thing, the researchers at InteraXon were concerned about something that I questioned while writing up the TUAW post -- why were these guys using electrocardiogram (ECG) pads instead of electroencephalogram (EEG) pads to pick up the brain waves?

The second concern that the company picked up on was the claim by the Project Black Mirror team that they were measuring brain activity on a scale of 0 to 5 volts. InteraXon notes that brain wave activity is measure in microvolts. InteraXon's COO Trevor Coleman says that there's "no way they could detect any meaningful brainwave signals through that setup."

To top it all off, Coleman says that the Project Black Mirror guys are making false claims about being able to decode such complex thoughts as "Call" or "John", noting that the ability to do so is about 15 years off. Emotiv, another company working full-time on thought control of devices, is able to get a small amount of control from a far more complex setup using 14 EEG inputs.

Several eagle-eyed TUAW readers also pointed out that the circuit board was flawed, as the speech synthesizer circuitry was shorted to the Arduino. Until the Project Black Mirror team 'fesses up to a hoax or tells the world just how they're allegedly achieving such amazing results, I'd guess that their Kickstarter fundraising days are on hold.



 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

8 Comments

Filter by:
qo

"For the first thing, the researchers at InteraXon were concerned about something that I questioned while writing up the TUAW post."

Hmm, I just read the original TUAW post, and don't see where this was questioned. Maybe I'm missing it?

November 15 2011 at 4:07 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Meredith McKay

Personally, I enjoy my verbal repartee with Siri too much to be interested in this even if it worked.

November 15 2011 at 1:50 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
The Graphic Mac

Likely? Was there ever a doubt?

November 14 2011 at 5:34 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Brian Richards

Despite all of the other flaws (and thusly proven fakery), it's still plausible that they could have mapped a simpler thought pattern (maybe a single idea like "red", one requiring less concentration) to a more complex process like "call john". Very non-intuitive, but still a solution.

November 14 2011 at 3:15 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Brian Richards's comment
xxp84

How about even simpler thoughts, like think angry thoughts to call your mother. And think about hot sex to call your girlfriend. Think about how you hate your life to call your work.

November 15 2011 at 3:58 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
zenogen

There were people who thought this was real?

November 14 2011 at 12:26 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Christo Is Christo

In other news, the sun is hot, and rain has been proven to be wet.

November 14 2011 at 12:09 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
evanskis

No!!! I was so excited :(

November 14 2011 at 12:07 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.