Skip to Content

Thoughts on an LTE iPhone

A lot of Apple fans are sure that the next iPhone will support the true 4G LTE networks now being deployed by major cellular carriers. Apple has repeatedly said that the iPhone will get LTE when battery life is not an issue, but the Houston Chronicle's Dwight Silverman notes that if the 4G Android devices hitting the market are any indication, that could be a while.

How bad is that battery life? Bad enough that in Engadget's testing of the device, they noted "Using Google Navigation with LTE enabled? The battery drained so fast our in-car charger couldn't keep up, leaving us unsure of which exit to take off the 101." Other LTE devices also seem to have similar issues, so it's not just the Galaxy Nexus to blame.

Sure, the speeds that LTE networks provide are tempting. Silverman's own testing in the Houston, Texas area shows broadband-like download speeds in the range of 30 - 45 Mbps (Megabits per second), while uploads are commonly in the 15-16 Mbps range. But when streaming a Netflix movie draws down the battery by 50 percent in 30 minutes, it's obvious that those speeds come at a price.

Silverman notes that he's "not optimistic" that Apple could get iPhone 4 / 4S-like battery life, even with newer-generation chipsets and an operating system tuned for battery longevity. He also hopes "that any LTE phone Apple offers will come with a setting that turns it off and allows users to drop back to 3G when battery life is more important than raw speed."

What do you think? Would you be willing to trade battery life for raw speed? Leave your comments below.



Categories

Apple iPhone

A lot of Apple fans are sure that the next iPhone will support the true 4G LTE networks now being deployed by major cellular carriers....
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

40 Comments

Filter by:
Andre

Nearly every Android phone has terrible battery life, doesn't matter if its single core, dual core, 3G or 4G so using them as a benchmark is not a good idea. Second all of the Verizon 4G devices have use both a CDMA chip and an LTE chip which means a bigger battery draw. The LTE chips coming out in the next year will integrate all of that into a single chip which means better battery life. Essentially what I'm saying is don't use current 2011 technology to gauge what a future 2012 device will be like.

December 21 2011 at 12:40 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Chris

Really you guys have no clue. First off a lot of my devices are apple mbp (7), mac mini (3) & ipads (yes more than 5). I do however have some none apple products like 2 windows 7 desktops and my phone which was the htc thunderbolt (now it is the nexus). 3g vs 4g hands down 4g. I am not talking about att pseudo 4g. I am talking verizon lte. 3g is like dial up compared to 4g real broadband. As for the battery well i carry around 1 extra battery and it gets me easily 36 hrs with both batteries. The battery is not that big (about the size of a credit card). Anyway i already see several people with their 4s and they have that silly looking extra battery pack docked on. Personally i would rather keep the device sleek and slim with the removeable battery then have to add a funny designed device piggy backed onto my phone.

December 20 2011 at 4:34 AM Report abuse -4 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to Chris's comment
Aaron B.

Yes, some people are willing to make sacrifices for less battery life. Apple does not cater to those people. End of story.

December 20 2011 at 12:30 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
hfwbr

What's wrong with this picture? You say you get 18 hours of use per battery--far more than, for example, Anand Lal Shimpi of Anandtech is able to get. The only way you might be able to do this is if you never use your phone to do things like, oh, browse the web. Kinda hard to believe if you have 12 computers and more than 5 iPads as you say you do. I don't want to say your credibility is suspect, but...your credibility is suspect.

December 20 2011 at 10:22 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Johanan Ottensooser

Would be great for tethering! - I could have 3g when I am out and about, and 4G when my phone is my internet!

December 19 2011 at 11:33 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Shannon Doherty

Why hasn't Apple invested money/time/energy into new battery technology? It would befit Apple to come out with some awesome new proprietary long-lasting battery tech for all portable devices (Macbooks included) that could beat the pants off any competitor and they own it, patents and all. And with super smooth integration into their OS and hardware, it would have that much more of an advantage. Why not?

December 19 2011 at 10:28 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
4 replies to Shannon Doherty's comment
Nostradukemas

You can 4G off and on any time you choose on an Android phone. The iPhone could do the exact same. If you choose need speed, you can have it on for just as long as you need it. Never understood why this was so complicated

December 19 2011 at 9:42 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
3 replies to Nostradukemas's comment
FreeRange

There is no question that apple will only do the right thing at the right time. Meanwhile, LTE phone purchasers are victims of fraud as their devices are next to unusable for that intended use. There's a sucker born ever minute in the jAndroid world.

December 19 2011 at 9:40 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
Timothy Tripp

I think they should vary the type of connection used based on the average transmission speed being used. In other words, if streaming a Netflix movie CAN be done over 3G, there's no reason to use 4G. Basically if they are peaking out the 3G speeds, switch to 4G. If only using 250kbps on 4G, downstep it to 3G. Even if there are server constraints causing slow speeds, this would work. It could be done in hardware.

At the VERY least, they could downstep to 3G when the battery reached, say, 40% or so. That way if we're on an external power source we'd always get 4G speeds but it wouldn't drain the battery all the way to dead.

In short, I want an LTE iPhone. I know the battery drain will be more than 3G, and as long as I have some options to control it I'm ready to make that jump before batteries are necessarily ready for it. I also have my iPhone 4s plugged in a lot of the time while I'm driving anyway because the GPS drains the battery excessively anyway.

I will switch to Verizon from AT&T when 2 things happen:

1. They offer an LTE iPhone with the ability to do voice and data at the same time
2. They offer a data plan with more than a 4GB/month cap that costs about the same as what they offer now. 4GB is a reasonable cap for 3G but it's not for 4G. They're kind of missing the whole point. Something around 50-100GB is more realistic for LTE speeds (you could go through 4GB in literally a day of Netflix HD).

December 19 2011 at 9:00 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Timothy Tripp's comment
crichton007

I think you're on to something here. One of the things that I like about my iPhone that I did for Android is that the phone is smart enough to be able to turn the GPS on and off as needed so why not do something similar for 4G?

December 20 2011 at 12:48 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to crichton007's comment
arsenal6

harder to switch between chips. The hand offs between cell towers and might not accept the switch.

I am not sure how the current 4S handles the 3g/2g. But i hear the concept is the same. The frequencies are not so it depends on efficiency factors. Or else its going to result in alot of dropped-calls

December 20 2011 at 3:12 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down
turbomuco

someone like juggernax3 probably has an android based phone or windows phone with a battery life of 5hrs. I have had everything from EVO 4G to Tmobile MyTouch to everything else in between. I worked for T-Mobile and can tell you for a fact that even with some "battery issues" an iPhone will outlast any android device out there as far as battery life goes. I had to switch back to an iPhone almost solely based on that fact, not to mention it's an amazing mp3 player, web browser and the thousands of relevant apps (not all that crap you find on the android market). And no im not a fanboy, I have tried android and it just sucks (heard great things about Galaxy S II, but again crappy battery life). iPhones are popular because they just simply work, duh.

December 19 2011 at 8:59 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Roberto

Certainly the market is ripe for fossil fuel cells that will bring us the 7-day charge time that we expect.

Otoh, there's only one datapoint of bad 4G power consumption, on Verizon. What about other 4G carriers?

December 19 2011 at 8:44 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
NetMage

2nd generation chipsets coming out in Q2 2012 means the iPhone 5 won't have LTE - that's too late even for an October launch.

December 19 2011 at 7:52 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to NetMage's comment
steve

I assume that is production quantities in Q2 and that engineering samples have existed for some time. Q2 production should be good enough for an October phone launch, but likely would be difficult to impossible for a summer launch.

December 20 2011 at 11:13 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
Aaron B.

Apple has a long history of obtaining components well before they are available to the rest of the market.

December 20 2011 at 12:37 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.