Apple targets Galaxy S II, other Samsung phones in new German suit

According to a Bloomberg report, Apple filed a new lawsuit in Germany that targets ten of Samsung's Android handsets. This new suit gives Apple a fresh start to argue for its EU design rights, which were recently called into question by Germany's Dusseldorf Court. It also gives the company an opportunity to win an injunction halting the sales of popular handsets like the Galaxy SII and the Galaxy S Plus.
Apple also filed another German lawsuit that cites five Samsung tablet models. This suit supposedly relates to a German lawsuit Apple filed earlier this year against Samsung and its Galaxy Tab 10.1. This older suit led to the ban of Galaxy 10.1 tablet sales in the European country and the subsequent development of the Galaxy 10.1N tablet. This redesigned tablet meets the court's criteria and will not be banned from retail shelves.
A Samsung spokesperson confirmed the company received the new phone and tablet lawsuits, but did not comment on them.
[Via AppleInsider]
Share
Categories
According to a Bloomberg report, Apple filed a new lawsuit in Germany that targets ten of Samsung's Android handsets. This new suit...
Add a Comment
@amajamus- Yes, most hamburgers look alike and taste alike and no one feels infringed. But, if McDonalds debuted a new hamburger that was completely different from the way anyone had made one before, and a few months later Burger King and the rest had one nearly identical, McDonalds should sue too.
Almost every phone looked the same before the first iPhone debut. Now most phones look like an iPhone. It appears to me that the other companies are the ones who haven't been innovating. Who says there can only one shape for a phone or tablet?
Let Samsung release a new design of their own with an innovative new UI and see how they feel when everyone copies it.
Wont Apple give up on Samsung? If Apple isn't careful, Samsung will stop supplying them the parts for their iphone.
January 18 2012 at 10:35 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI guess after Steve's death all Apple can do is sue more succesful companies for revenue, since I cannot see any innovation any more.
Shame on you, Apple. Not so long ago you used to be a good company producing formidable products that could generate revenue for simply being better than the competition.
You do realize that tech companies have products planned for at LEAST the next 3 years, right? So Apple has a 3 year cushion. Not only that, but they still have Johnny Ive. If Johnny Ive left, then I could understand your concern. If anything, the products that we are going to see will be better than before because while Steve Jobs did have plenty of successes he also had plenty of failures. He may have been the final decision maker-along with Johnny Ive- who made sure a product was good to go, but he was not the sole reason for Apple's ingenuity. If you have read his Biography, Steve Jobs was never very tech savvy as far as how it should be made, ect. He was just a perfectionist. To say that you can not see any more innovation is a very poor way to view Apple because since Steve did in fact help plan for the next 3 years of Products, you are saying that the products you are currently seeing do not have innovation which would then discredit the way you viewed Steve Jobs. As for the suing, can you really blame them? Apple is currently one of the most recognized brands in the WORLD. Their products have always been set apart by not just capabilities, but by form factor and general aesthetics. Let's say that another company (Samsung for instance) starts making products that look JUST like yours. Considering that probably 90% of the public views your product to be very attractive and is some motivation for buying your products, that's a very big deal. It makes the competition harder because then you just have to beat them out by specs. How much of the public is TRULY aware of what a processor is and how it works, and how it and RAM and 8megapixel cameras are? Not that much. So when the public is not very aware of the difference of what's under the hood, and your product is designed to be attractive; it's rightful to sue, especially when you have patents on your design.
January 18 2012 at 9:02 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyMcDonalds is one, if not the most recognized symbols not just in the US but around the world but they do not go around suing Burger King because their hamburgers are round like McDonalds or contain the same amount of meat, cheese, or condiments. How many shapes do cell phones and tablets come in? One. So, I don't buy your theory . . .
January 18 2012 at 12:25 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate downno one wants your shitty products anymore apple, go away.
January 18 2012 at 12:16 AM Report abuse Permalink -3 rate up rate down ReplyI knew there was a reason why I really liked the way the S II felt...
January 17 2012 at 8:44 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyDeals of the Day
more deals- Acoustic Research Digital Photo Frame with iPod Dock for $50 + free shipping
- Apple iPhone 4 8GB for Verizon, AT&T, or Sprint for $50 + pickup at Best Buy
- Unlocked iPhone 4S 16GB for GSM (AT&T, T-Mobile) for $619 + free shipping
- Apple iMac Core i7 Quad 3.4GHz 27" w/ 24GB RAM, 2TB HDD for $2,677 + $29 s&h
- Used Apple Magic Mouse for $36 + $4 s&h
- Skullcandy Riot Earbud Headphones for $10 + free shipping
8 Comments