Skip to Content

At last, Steve Jobs may demolish old home



1984 wasn't just a landmark year for Apple, but it was also the year that Steve Jobs bought an aging mansion. Jobs lived in the house, originally built in the 1920s, for 10 years then rented it out. Since 2001, he's tried to get the mansion torn down to build a new home, saying that it was " one of the biggest abominations of a house I've ever seen," but preservationists stopped him. He even tried to give it away in 2005, but that didn't succeed.

AppleInsider reports that Uphold Our Heritage has dropped its appeal of a demolition permit issued to Jobs in 2009. The group wanted two residents to dismantle and move the house two miles away, then open it to the public once a year, which actually falls in line with the original demolition terms from December 2004. However, the couple who wanted to do this had a number of stipulations for both Jobs and the town, the Menlo Park Almanac reported, and they later dropped their bid. Other attempts to salvage the home were blocked due to Uphold challenging Jobs in court. Historically significant parts of the home will be removed and preserved, per the 2009 permit.

AppleInsider produced a photo gallery of the house last year after a photographer noticed that the house's gates, doors and windows were entirely open.


Categories

Apple

1984 wasn't just a landmark year for Apple, but it was also the year that Steve Jobs bought an aging mansion. Jobs lived in the...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

16 Comments

Filter by:
artifex

"the house's gates, doors and windows were entirely open."

Sure looked like most of them were boarded up in the pictures.

August 23 2010 at 8:50 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
spyker

The house looks terrible. I wouldn't have even wanted to step inside, it's like a haunted mansion.

August 23 2010 at 4:38 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
emil

[Filed under "who cares"]

August 23 2010 at 4:07 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
John P.

What a dump. Looking at the pictures I can just see Steve skulking around in there wondering if the boogeyman was about to jump out from some dark moldy corner.

August 23 2010 at 3:16 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
deb

After viewing the pictures of that home I find it an abomination of justice that Uphold our Heritage had any say or ability to prevent Jobs from doing what he wanted.

August 23 2010 at 2:49 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to deb's comment
Brett

*Even without* viewing the pictures of that home I find it an abomination of justice that Uphold our Heritage had any say or ability to prevent Jobs from doing what he wanted.


There, fixed it for you.

August 23 2010 at 3:46 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Matt J

You don't think historic buildings should be preserved? Granted, that one, at

August 23 2010 at 4:57 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Glock23

You choose to live in Commiefornia, I have no sympathy if you are forced to live by their stupid rules.

August 23 2010 at 2:44 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Simplicated

How late is this post?

Oh, five days.

August 23 2010 at 2:33 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
mark

The house is an abomination, but I'll live in it for 10 years.

Gee Steve there must be another house somewhere in this rich town you could have purchased instead.

August 23 2010 at 2:31 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to mark's comment
cv

Steve has another property in nearby city of Palo Alto. Actually, it's two adjacent lots that he combined into one. He had to deal with preservation issues with that place as well, although he was able to legally tear down the larger structure while preserving the smaller one (much to the chagrin of some preservationists).

August 23 2010 at 2:54 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Steve

This article leaves out a lot of information. You could have at least summarized a bit more about the plans for the house. The original article has too much detail, and this one has too little.

August 23 2010 at 2:18 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Steve's comment
jorn

Pappa Bear's article was toooo big. Momma Bear's article was tooooo short.

Quick, get Baby Bear to the editorial room!

August 23 2010 at 2:28 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
SC

This is like 5 days old news LMAO !

August 23 2010 at 2:18 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.