ModBook almost ready to ship?

Our friends at jkOnTheRun recently got word from Axiotron that the long fabled ModBook, which you might recall from Macworld 2007 (here is a video we shot of the ModBook, and a gallery), is going to ship on or around January 8th, 2008 a year since it was announced. Since the ModBook has been delayed so much, its specs have changed. It is now running Leopard, the GPS option is standard (formerly $99), and the specs reflect the latest MacBook hardware rev (since the ModBook is basically a MacBook converted into a tablet with a pressure sensitive touch screen).
All of this starting at $2279.00. Here's hoping that Apple doesn't rev the MacBook at Macworld this year, for Axiotron's sake.
Share
Categories
Our friends at jkOnTheRun recently got word from Axiotron that the long fabled ModBook, which you might recall from Macworld 2007 (here is...
Add a Comment
First things first. The iPhone doesn't implement any multi-touch use. It's bi-touch (i've not seen any implementation where three fingers are used, the screen just isn't that big, dunno if the hardware is capable) which is a pretty dumbed down alternative to true multi-touch.
Just because Apple has a limited implementation of this technology on the iPhone, doesn't mean it's anywhere near ready for OS X (especially when they said they had to take OS X developers out of the OS dev space into iPhone dev). With the barebones use of touch sensitivity for the iPhone, it's immensely hard to believe there is anything ready for the immediate future for Mac OS X (we're talking about the Client OS here, not a mobile version). Integrating a new input handling layer into the OS is monumentally huge. In consideration of how everything developed thus far for the Mac OS, either by Apple or third parties, has been on the presumption of a mouse and keyboard (and some cases optical/vocal and other alternate inputs) for its input.
Remember that Leopard JUST came out, and has had no signs of multi-touch implementation, I think we are far far far off from seeing this being a realistic outcome for full fledged personal (desktop) computing from Apple. This is why Microsoft and Apple so far are utilizing new touch sensitive approaches in limited semi-niche devices, to get the public used to such interactivity through a less dominant device.
While I still think an Ultra portable is still very much going to be
release at MWSF, its going to be just that, ultra-portable... meaning
long battery life, small form factor... still the same means of input.
The goal for the Axiotron was to bring tablet like functionality to the Mac OS. Which they are still supposedly doing, but in a relatively archaic form with the use of a stylus. Apple will not release a competing product with a stylus, nor are they ready to release one using a multi-touch approach... at least not in a fully capable computer, I could see something like a bigger iPod Touch or new Newton though. The Mac OS isn't designed to accept multiple points of input, nor is any software really designed to work in such a fashion. There was that piece of software that was essentially a giant track pad that could understand multiple input points, but it was used for gestural recognition... which was nothing more than a much more complicated (and harder to remember) implementation of keyboard shortcuts.
A Multi-touch Mac is not happening, nor is a tablet or anything other full fledged machine with touch sensitivity... an alternate device, like an uber PDA, perhaps.
Yeah, Windows Mobile isn't failing, and isn't crap to use, either. WM6 is a vast improvement over 5, and the WM platform practically killed Palm. It pretty much owns the handheld OS market. Iphone didn't outsell it overnight, just owns a small percentage of the market now... just like Apple does of the personal computer market. Besides, it's apples and oranges here, the iphone is a device. Windows Mobile is a platform. Microsoft doesn't build phones, or computers for that matter.
One last thing, @5- smartphones were not "dorky" pre-iphone. Apple just has really good timing. Smartphones had already taken off in popularity when the iphone was released. This was completely different from their iPod, which systematically started the MP3 "revolution." I mean, does anyone remember the original Mp3 players from Diamond, Iriver, and the like? No.
You need to check your facts and your history, my man. Windows Mobile is and has been doing terribly. It has lost Microsoft over half a billion dollars over the last 4 years. Though it's getting more difficult to track precisely how much they are losing as MS has recently rolled WinCE in with their XBOX and Zune failures, totally 1.3 billlion in loses in 2006.
Windows Mobile doesn't even have the largest smartphone market share. They aren't even second. Symbian is by far in the lead with roughly 75% of the market wordlwide. Linux is second. MS is third. Or, was third.
iPhone outsold Windows Mobile in its first quarter on the market in the US. So, no, Windows doesn't "pretty much own" the market. Reality is far from that. Hell, Windows wasn't even in first in the US before the iPhone. That was Blackberry/RIM.
Yes, the iPhone is a device. It's also a platform. Windows Mobile is WinCE, an OS built for handheld computers, shoved into a phone. And it fails miserably at both. Facts prove this. But don't be bothered by those.
It's sensitive, not sensative.
Sorry for being a spelling wonk.
i was going to point out the same error, thanks
December 25 2007 at 5:56 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyIt's too bad that this wasn't released earlier. OWC really dropped the ball for funding of these units from Axiontech. Don't expect the build quality of these to even be good, the components used in it weren't meant to last more than 2 years tops before they start failing.
I consider this vapor until word comes from OWC that they are shipping...
Simon Arch, when Apple doesn't, then what? This product is already dead in the water. It's a year later and it hasn't shipped. DOA
That's what I said in my first post.
Also, an ultraportable or even tablet is hardly niche if done correctly. The problem is you are making your comparison to Windows tablets, which are complete crap. Ultraportables are very popular simply for their size. TabletPCs, on the other hand, have continuously failed. This is not the fault of the concept but the execution.
If you'd like a real world example of something similar look no further than WinCE/Windows Mobile. 10 years it's been out there and failed miserably. Lost money the entire time and is still a pile of crap to use. Apple introduces a smartphone into a market everyone said was niche, over saturated, etc, etc. What happens? They outsell Windows Mobile practically overnight.
AppleTV. How is that niche? No more niche than iPod was when they introduced it. Though I think they somehwat have botched the rollout of the product and supporting media/software. It's hardly niche though. It's a strong, relatively new and untapped market. The only thing there is a bunch of crap based on Windows. I predict a mirror of what happened with the iPhone.
As for the ModBook. It's too little too late for too much. It's DOA. That doesn't mean it's bad, it's just the wrong product at the wrong time. Maybe a year ago people would have bought. But not now.
Just want to agree. This thing is DOA. The only way for this to be mildly successful is to go back in time and launch it a year ago.
December 26 2007 at 1:59 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyWhat's really sad is it won the 2007 Best of Show award, and it will barely ship before the 2008 BoS is awarded.
December 25 2007 at 12:11 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyWe saw this at the last Macworld. Didn't realize that it wasn't shipping yet. I'm growing tired of companies who do this, whether they charge before shipping or not. Looking at you too, Griffin.
December 24 2007 at 10:40 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyCan't you just patch the Leopard image and install OS X on a PC tablet?
Although laptops are where apple really accels hardware-wise, and I suppose Axiotron got it right too... I really want to consider this.
You could do that, but good luck selling it without being sued by Apple. Leopard is meant to be installed on Mac hardware. This is a product that will ship soon, so they have to modify Apple laptops to keep in line with Apple's licenses.
December 25 2007 at 1:29 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyWow, I've even seen ads for this in magazines, I thought it was released long ago
December 24 2007 at 10:21 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyHot Apps on TUAW
Deals of the Day
more deals- Refurb Apple MacBook Air Laptops: 12" 64GB SSD for $699 + free shipping
- JVC Motion Sensing Clock Radio with Dual iPod Docks for $55 + free shipping
- Apple iPhone Headset with Mic for $4 + $2 s&h
- miFrame Picture Frame Dock for iPad for $64 + $8 s&h
- Refurb Apple iPod nano 8GB MP3 Player for $99 + free shipping, 16GB for $119
- Hannspree Apple-Shaped 28" 1080p LCD HDTV for $270 + free shipping
Software Updates
more updates- EFI Firmware Update brings Lion Internet Recovery to 2010-model Macs
- OS X Lion 10.7.3 released with Safari 5.1.3, Wi-Fi bug fix
- Aperture updated to 3.2.2, addresses Photo Stream issue
- Apple updates Keynote to address Lion issues
- Google Search app gets new look on iPad
- Apple releases Apple TV Software Update 4.4.3



24 Comments