Skip to Content

The history of the mythical iTablet

Stefan Constantinescu of IntoMobile has written a lengthy piece dissecting the long, tortuous history of the Newton II/Apple Tablet/iTablet/Tablet Mac. It's a pretty comprehensive look at seven years worth of speculation, rumor, outlandish analyst claims, more speculation, more rumor, and event after event with no release of what's become Apple's most infamous vaporware product.

The article is definitely worth a read (as long as you're not sensitive to its occasionally salty language), but the conclusion Constantinescu reaches at the end of the article is perhaps most interesting of all:

"The Apple Tablet does not exist. What do I believe will happen? [...] I believe what will be announced at the end of this year, or early next year, is a new MacBook with a 10 or 11.6 inch screen. The screen may or may not be touch enabled. This will be the first Mac portable with a 16:9 aspect ratio LCD. Why wide? One reason: foot print. With a wide LCD, a laptop in the open/closed position can house a wider keyboard."

While that certainly sounds plausible, there's one thing I have to wonder: aside from a slightly wider keyboard and a possible touch screen, what distinguishes that theoretical miniature MacBook from the glut of netbooks made by other manufacturers, products that Apple has derided as underpowered machines that provide a dismal user experience?

While Apple does have a history of taking existing products, putting their own spin on them, and gaining industry laurels for innovation as a result (iMac, iPod), the introduction of a product like the one Constantinescu is talking about seems a little bit too much "Me too!" even for Apple. Such a device would also heavily cannibalize sales of the MacBook Air, to the point of making that device largely irrelevant.

After reading this piece, our own Aron Trimble noted, "I don't think it makes any more sense to speculate on what Apple will not do than to speculate on what Apple will do." Despite the fact that I pretty much did just the same thing, I agree with him.

The only thing that's certain about all of this: until Apple releases something like an iTablet, or definitively says "We will never, ever make this product, and we mean it, pinky swear!" the speculation will never end.

What do you think? Do you agree with Constantinescu that the long-rumored Tablet Mac will never see the light of day? Let us know in the comments.

(Picture by Adam Benton for MacFormat magazine)

Stefan Constantinescu of IntoMobile has written a lengthy piece dissecting the long, tortuous history of the Newton II/Apple...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

39 Comments

Filter by:
Wade@wadesisco.com

What's the name going to be?

iTouchpad

iPad

etc.?

August 09 2009 at 11:59 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
chris

The iTablet rumor is true. Apple will be removing the stand from the iMac and rembranding it as the iTablet. Case solved!

August 07 2009 at 3:40 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to chris's comment
Debby

And then they'll sell you a stand for $200!

August 27 2009 at 4:47 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Proxima

I suspect that the much rumored tablet will fill the niche between a full laptop and the iPhone/iPod (well, like duh! Mr. Einstein!) The core tablet will be just that, a touch-screen device, with a 7 to 9" screen. Keyboard/mouse will be optional. Perhaps Apple might actually produce a docking station for it. Without the external devices it will be a really cool ebook reader/internet device. And even useful for light entry work such as nurses making the rounds, or UPS guys tracking deliveries. With the io devices, you have a neat lightweight device that compares favorably to the hackintoshes. Albeit at about twice the price.

I strongly suspect it will be OS-X based with touchscreen extensions (touch input, soft keyboard, of course, no big-whoop there). But I would not be surprised if they took the iPhone simulator from the SDK and productized that so not only would users get a full Mac experience, they can also enjoy their favorite iPhone apps on the same screen.

August 05 2009 at 11:39 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
(01)

By definition, doesn't vaporware actually have to be announced? To my knowledge, Apple has never said they were working on a tablet. Just saying.

August 04 2009 at 7:56 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
B-Mac

Earlier this year I bought a 13" Macbook. Why? Because there wasn't an affordable 11" model. What I really wanted was an 11", lightweight, full function Macbook with an external optical drive like the one from the Air. (Not a netbook.)

If Apple has ordered 10/11" touch screens, that would fit perfectly in such a device. Lightweight, widescreen, full keyboard, total OSX perfection.

Take it one step further, instead of a physical keyboard make it from a sheet of touch sensitive e-ink. Toss in a hinge that enables the two screens to fold back to back. Use as a regular laptop with the screen serving as the touchpad or turn the "keyboard" face down for a standup, touchscreen controlled media player. Fold it further back, turn off the color screen, turn it over and you have a low power Apple e-book reader.

The Apple iEverything!

What the heck, I can dream.

August 04 2009 at 6:42 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
SerranoSlim

It could be successful if it's a wireless touchscreen monitor that can be used away from the computer via Wifi or used independently. When used independently, it's a big iPod Touch that plays whatever media you've loaded onto its internal storage, which should be expandable. It covers all of the bases:
1. Lay it flat to use as a graphics tablet for a Mac or PC.
2. Stand it up next to a Mac or PC to add a second display.
3. Take it with you as a standalone iTunes player, Kindle e-book reader, and Safari browser with on-screen keyboard (or pair with the Apple BT keyboard).
4. Connect it to your Mac or PC from anywhere to run software remotely, but it will seem as though you're running it in the monitor.

August 04 2009 at 3:41 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
James

My Dell Mini 9 running OS X begs to differ that "poor user experience" that Apple talks about.

Notebooks are becoming cheaper, there is no reason that white Macbook is not under $800, and they are seriously limiting themselves in arguably the most popular notebook market ($600-$900) market.

I'm cautiously optimistic, on one hand I expect it to be in that $600-$900 price range, on the other I expect comparable computers to be much cheaper.

August 04 2009 at 3:27 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Bill Mac

What would it matter if it cuts into the Air's sales. Who says the Air is around to stay. I think it was a neat design exercise, not a mainstay product. Look what happened to the Cube, iPod Mini, etc.

I'm not sure a tablet would be of much use to me, but only because of the size. I love that I can carry my iPhone around in my pocket. There is nothing more convenient! The touchscreen is perfect for viewing and typing regardless of what the luddites say about needing a keyboard. An iPhone is practically a whole computer in your pocket already - so who needs and iTablet?

...maybe if the iTablet could be "folded up" to fit into my pocket.... Now you're talkin... Hmmmm...

August 04 2009 at 2:55 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Bill Mac's comment
Shunnabunich

Yeah, that's what I was thinking. When was the MacBook Air ever relevant except as an example of Apple's slipping sanity (see also: an iPod with no controls, $99 for online services that are free everywhere else)?

August 05 2009 at 7:34 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Peter Ent

I don't think it would be wise for Apple to make a pure Mac OS X netbook/tablet. That would cut into Macbook sales. They have to offer something different/innovative.

They've got an App Store full of software. A giant iPod touch with bluetooth stereo and keyboard/mouse support makes more sense. Entertainment-oriented (books, movies, games). Apps can make it productive, all Apple has to do is define the architecture. Using it should be an "experience" and not mundane.

They will have to put full Safari on it with the Flash Player to make this thing sing.

Don't forget that the iPhone runs a mini-OS X, so an iTablet could have the real deal, you just won't easily see it.

August 04 2009 at 2:41 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
dmonceaux

A few items that I have not seen stated by others warrant mentioning. First, is it more than coincidence that Apple is releasing Snow Leopard at or near the hypothetical release of the tablet? Also, what business sense is it for Apple to offer a major rewrite of OSX, reducing code size but without adding new features and then selling it for a whopping $29. In an of itself this is a money loser. My theory is the new tablet architecture is the driving force behind the OSX rewrite.

Therefore, in support:

1-With only pricy SSD for tablet storage OSX footprint is important. The improved boot time provides a near iPhone - iPod Touch experience with a full OS.
2-Open CL allows Apple to get high-end performance from low-end processors such as Intel's Atom or equivalent. This prevents the tablet from be a dog of a netbook. What other reason is there for this feature?
3-Grand Central offers better performance from multi-core processors. Not only Intel chips but also multi-core ARM's or in-house chips coming out of P.A. Semi.
4-Quicktime update confirms the recent reports that the tablet offers excellent video/movie experience.
5-Apple's addition of SD slots in recent laptops. Why? Adding an SD slot for emergency boots, etc. doesn't make sense. Apple doesn't sell to IT groups, the focus is on the consumer. SD cards are a cost effective means of adding storage to a tablet. SD cards are big and getting bigger and cheaper. Currently, a 64GB card can be had for less than $80. With a SD equipped tablet expect 128 GB cards at less than $100 with a year. Using SD's to store and move movie, photo, and music libraries around makes consumer sense.

I recommend people take a closer look at Snow Leopard for evidence of what the tablet will look like.

August 04 2009 at 11:41 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.