Skip to Content

Is the MacBook Pro about to receive a quad-core speed bump?


With all the news circulating around about updated Apple hardware, you might be asking yourself "What about the MacBook Pro?" Apple certaintly hasn't forgotten about its high-end notebook computer, and details are starting to slip out that the MacBook Pro might be receiving a speed boost sooner than anyone might have predicted.

Applesfera is reporting that some information about unreleased MacBook Pro models has been found in support files of the latest developer build of Mac OS X 10.6.2. In addition, there's been some talk on 9to5Mac that Apple Store geniuses are starting to work with the new Core i5 and i7 Quad-Core processors that may make their way into the notebooks.

While nothing is definite, it's looking like the release of OS X 10.6.2 and the refresh of the MacBook Pro might come in tandem, and sooner than we think.

Thanks to everyone who sent this in.




Categories

Hardware Rumors Macbook Pro

With all the news circulating around about updated Apple hardware, you might be asking yourself "What about the MacBook Pro?" Apple...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

21 Comments

Filter by:
Squatch

I am on the final weeks/days of putting up with pcs (especially my HP laptop). I recently got an iphone 3gs, and love the way apple products feel/function! I would get a new MBP tomorrow if it wasnt for the possibility of a massive update! GO QUADCORE!

October 30 2009 at 9:07 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
jbrown510

MacBook Pro price drops = MacBook Pro 6,1

Probably a new video card... maybe a new CPU. The real question is will it come in January or before the holidays.

October 27 2009 at 2:40 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Pete

Silly folks...that is the macbook touch! :D :D :D

October 26 2009 at 7:16 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
MikeWard1701

Dang, I just bought a 2.53 MBP 13 :|

Seriously wodering what, if anything, is gonna happen with the 13" MBPs and what to do.

Are we likely to see any change to the 13s?

October 26 2009 at 5:47 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to MikeWard1701's comment
Cy Starkman

Mike,

Curious as to why you got the 2.53 13" MBP anyway. Especially if you just got it. The new white macbook is nipping at the heels and is heaps cheaper.

Sure 8gig option, SD, FW and hard case, but the base 13" mbp does all that as well if they are things you want. The CPU is totally whatever.

Having looked at the current models the only two worth buying are the WhiteMB and the 15" MBP with dedicated GPU. Or the 13" MBP base model if you need the hard case due to usage.

Some people might argue the FW but I reckon without the 2nd audio port that is on the 15" those 13" are questionable FW or not.

The 17" is irrelevant unless a person REALLY needs the Express Card slot and I mean REALLY needs it, not just thinks they need it for some alleged purpose. I reckon if someone was wanting to buy one through me, unless they could show me the Express Card module they wanted with it I would refuse to be part of it. A SATA slot for example is a good reason.

As for Quad Core, I would not be expecting them in the 13", probably the 17" since there is all that wasted space just to support the screen which could be used for heat management and there needs to be a compelling reason to get the 17"

October 26 2009 at 7:05 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
KP

I'm going to be saving over the next six months to be able to upgrade to a new MBP in the next 6-12 months. This sounds like a nice change, but in the "real world" of today's (or the near future's) computing, how useful is a quad core over a dual core, really? It seems like even a dual core is still not taken advantage of by some of the software that's out there.

October 26 2009 at 2:36 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Matt Jones

The Lynnfield i5 is probably a little power-hungry for what Apple's planning; I'd be a lot more likely to believe an Arrandale + external GPU solution. It would still cut the chip count by 1 (NB/MC/graphics on-CPU) and offer a lot better power usage.

Astute readers will note that Arrandale isn't out yet - but that doesn't preclude Apple getting it early (similar to the Nehalem Xeons).

October 26 2009 at 2:10 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
jay

Boss, is it right time to buy iphone? Or is new iphone4 coming soon like in Jan' 2010?

October 26 2009 at 12:58 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to jay's comment
Joseph

http://buyersguide.macrumors.com/#iPhone

October 26 2009 at 1:21 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mattazuma

The nvidia chipset Apple is using for the MBP won't work with the core i5/i7. I don't see them changing chipsets back to Intel as part of a running change.

Maybe they are going to the mobile core 2 quad chips, which would work with the nvidia chipset.

October 26 2009 at 12:40 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Mattazuma's comment
Fozzy Bear

They just remove the 9400 chipset. The i5/i7 has chipset on die. All that is left is the southbridge chip which could easily be accommodated by Intel -- I doubt nvidia has a serious performance advantage in the wide-open world of SATA transfer.

October 26 2009 at 12:55 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
solarpos

When the education deal for a =n iPod Touch with a new MBP came out I ebayed my original 1.83 MBP for $980. Not bad when I received a new MBP for 1149. Throw in an iPod Touch and it cost me 169 for both. Try that with a windows machine.

October 26 2009 at 12:26 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Doug

If the i5 and i7 are coming to MBPs, it's going to have to come in a dedicated mobile variant. A 90W processor would kill battery life if something isn't done about its power usage.

October 26 2009 at 12:19 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Doug's comment
Fozzy Bear

This change wouldn't be too drastic -- the i5/i7 has chipset (memory controller, QPI, PCIe) on die so they're saving space by removing the need for the nVidia chipset.

Even though it's 90W, That's 90W for the entire die -- including QPI, memory controller, and PCIe (formerly the Northbridge) as well as the processor cores. When you recalculate the watts for the C2D and the Northbridge -- the gap narrows considerably. I know the desktop C2Ds were 65W + about 25W for the north bridge = 90W. Not sure about the MBP mobile architecture.

They can also downclock it and fiddle enough with the Turbo settings to keep the watts low enough to not wreck battery life but still see marked performance gains.

I would know, I've just done this with a desktop Core 2 Duo moving to an i7 860 -- both at spec and heavily OC'd.

While they're at it, they ought to get the 9400 and 9600 working together, too.

October 26 2009 at 12:54 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.