Skip to Content

Macworld posts MacBook Air benchmark results

When the new MacBook Airs were introduced, many were shocked to see a 1.4GHz Core 2 Duo processor in the standard 11-inch model and a 1.86GHz Core 2 Duo processor in the standard 13-inch model. Isn't that a step backward? The previous generation had either a 1.83GHz or a 2.13GHz Core 2 Duo processor standard.

The folks at Macworld ran some formal benchmark tests on both the 11.6-inch and the 13-inch Airs, comparing them to their predecessors and even a 13-inch MacBook Pro. The results may surprise you. To begin, the Speedmark 6.5 score doubled when comparing the 13-inch 1.86GHz MacBook Air and the 2009 13-inch 1.86GHz MacBook Air (Speedmark is Macworld's benchmark test suite). Most of the gains were made over drive-based tests, as the new Air's flash storage was able to show off a bit. Duplicating a 1GB file on the new Air took 13 seconds; compare that to 69 seconds on the model from 2009. Likewise, compressing a 2GB folder was 21% faster on the new Air.

Other benefits include graphics improvements, despite the new Air's integrated subsystem. The nVidia GeForce 320M in the current Air produced over 3 times as many frames per second while running Call of Duty 4 when compared to the nVidia GeForce 9400M that's in the 2009 MacBook Air.

Processor-intensive tasks were also better on the current Air and the 13-inch model even out performed a 13-inch MacBook Pro when it came to drive-related tasks. Specifically, both models of the Air were faster in the file-duplication tests and compression tests.

There's much more of course, and we recommend you read the full report. In short, flash storage is a huge benefit, the battery life is improved and the current line of processors needn't make us cringe so severely.



When the new MacBook Airs were introduced, many were shocked to see a 1.4GHz Core 2 Duo processor in the standard 11-inch model and a...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

7 Comments

Filter by:
apdg

Is there a meaningful way to compare these Speedmark 6.5 results with earlier Speedmark versions? (specifically, Speedmark 5) I'm assuming there isn't since the two are calibrated to different machines and OSs.

Perhaps there is another, similar, suite of tests that would let people (aka, me) compare the new machines with machines they're likely to already own that are 2-3 years old.

October 27 2010 at 5:56 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
brian

Bah! Hit 'submit' too soon. I forgot to mention, the old one was a disk-based model. I, too, would like to see a new-flash-vs-old-SSD comparison.

October 26 2010 at 8:13 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
brian

My local Apple store has a new 13" MBA sitting next to an old one. The old one boots in 45 seconds, the new one in 15.

October 26 2010 at 8:12 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to brian's comment
pinn

I don't know, my 1.86 ssd boots in less than 25 seconds.

October 27 2010 at 9:04 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
pinn

It's odd that they benchmarked the new MBA against the last-gen 1.86 MBA with a hard drive. Wouldn't it have been more appropriate to benchmark it against the prior gen with an SSD?

October 26 2010 at 5:34 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
rhodesy22

Looking forward to them benchmarking the 4gb 2.13ghz. Mine arrives on Thursday :D

I'm so pleased that they've sorted out the heat issues that shut one of the cores off - that's why I sold the last 2.

October 26 2010 at 3:53 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Pete

throw an aftermarket SSD into a current gen 13" mbp and it'll smoke the new mba's. plus, it'll be a couple hundo cheaper...

October 26 2010 at 3:17 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.