New MacBook Pro benchmarks show marked improvement

Primate Labs snagged the latest Geekbench 2 results for the new MacBook Pros and compared the benchmarks to previous generation models. Good news for those planning to grab a latest generation model. The results show a big jump in performance for the MacBook Pros with the new quad-core Sandy Bridge processors.
These latest generation machines are scoring between 8,000 to 10,000, a marked increase over the 5,000 to 6,000 recorded by the 2010 MacBook Pro models. In this test, the bigger the resulting number, the better the performance. These scores from the quad-core MacBook Pro models are 80% better than the 2010 models and competitive with the latest Mac Pro desktops. As expected, the latest 13-inch models now sport the dual-core Core i5 and Core i7 processors which boosts their performance to the same level as last year's 15-inch models.
When looking at these results, remember that Geekbench 2 only measures CPU and memory performance; it does not take into account GPU or SSD contribution to performance. Sometimes a tricked out 2010 model may score higher than an entry-level 2011 model. Overall though, these early results suggest 2011 MacBook Pro owners will be happy with the performance from their shiny, new machines. They may also tempt more than a handful of 2010 owners to jump ship and grab the latest generation machines.
[Via Macrumors]
Share
Categories
Primate Labs snagged the latest Geekbench 2 results for the new MacBook Pros and compared the benchmarks to previous generation...
Add a Comment
I'm wondering... when will the MacBook Air be updated to include Thunderbolt... and what do we think the processor will be?
I've got the early 2008 black MacBook, and I'm considering a new computer since my battery is shot, HD is smaller than I'd use, and when I put my palm on the computer it registers a touchpad 'click'...
I'm still undecided between a MBP 13", an 11" MBA, or the HP convertible tablet... the only thing I've missed switching to Mac is how amazing it was to have the ability to do homework on my computer and just print it off if a professor insisted on a paper copy. Mr. Jobs obsession with not having a pen is a little misguided. Wacom precision is vital for handwriting... If I got the HP, I would definitely keep my current computer and kind of... desktop it... Mini-DVI to DVI to HDMI, bluetooth keyboard and mouse/trackpad, makes it great for replacing my desire for a Mac Mini...
I would just like to see the day when it will be easy to upgrade a laptop. pop in new processors add thunderbolt and what not with no issues. Still little bit sad no sub 3.0 on these.
February 25 2011 at 8:46 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyHow long before we can get an updated Mac Mini with one of these quad-core processors, two drives (no optical, one SSD) and Lion with built-in OS X Server, for about a grand? All the pieces are in place!
February 25 2011 at 3:44 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI'm thinking of upgrading from early 2008 to this model, although I'm wondering if the second revision in the summer or fall would be much better, or just a bump in specs. I've got a 2.8 C2D, 4GB RAM 15" MBP.
February 25 2011 at 3:41 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyIf you have a pre-2007 Mac, and Lion won't support pre-2007 Core 2 Duos, you have NO CHOICE but to get one of these.
Well, maybe you do...but this is your emotions talking, not logic. Let your desire overrule your supposedly rational being.
Looks fantastic, I really wish the matte screen is available on the 13" model, and shame that 7200 rpm 750 GB drive is not available, guess I'll pick one up from Fry's with 8 GB of RAM and save $200 from Apple's pricing scheme.
February 25 2011 at 12:27 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI have an early 2009 MBP (2.66 GHz Core 2 Duo, 4 GB RAM). Would I notice enough of a performance increase to justify the upgrade? I mainly use the MBP for some games (will be playing Diablo III), Garageband and iMovie.
February 25 2011 at 12:04 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI got the same one. I think the GPU will be much faster in the new mbp and in addition the cpu is much faster. So yes.
February 25 2011 at 1:35 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyNuts to the people with 2010 models, I'm trying to get my boss to upgrade our 2008 models!
February 25 2011 at 11:33 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyInteresting, but I'm a bit suspicious of -real world- performance in a 4-core configuration. Not all apps make full use of multiple cores. (One such app is Mail.app, which seems to have some significant concurrency problems when trying to check multiple accounts at the same time, particularly during startup.) The faster RAM sure helps, though. Too bad this didn't come with the rumored SSD "startup drive," that would have been very cool.
Writing concurrent applications is -hard work-, and as usual Apple has their preferred way to do it (Grand Central Dispatch).
But then this could just be sour grapes on my part, since I just bought a MB Pro a couple weeks ago :-( Yeah, I should have waited, but my 4 year old machine was on the fritz... That older machine has a Seagate Hybrid drive in it, which might have been the causes of its problems. The Hybrid drive did run cooler and faster than the previous 7200 conventional drive. That experience indicates to me the idea of 'SSD startup drive' could be a real winner!
DAYUMMM!
Now how do I sneak this $2000 purchase past the wife?
Deals of the Day
more deals- Acoustic Research Digital Photo Frame with iPod Dock for $50 + free shipping
- Apple iPhone 4 8GB for Verizon, AT&T, or Sprint for $50 + pickup at Best Buy
- Unlocked iPhone 4S 16GB for GSM (AT&T, T-Mobile) for $619 + free shipping
- Apple iMac Core i7 Quad 3.4GHz 27" w/ 24GB RAM, 2TB HDD for $2,677 + $29 s&h
- Used Apple Magic Mouse for $36 + $4 s&h
- 9-Piece iPhone Bundle, includes 1,900mAh battery for $8 + free shipping
19 Comments