Skip to Content

iPod nano: the first 24 hours

iPod nano in handI've had my iPod nano in hand (and large ogre-like hands if the picture with this post is any indicator) now for 24 hours. Three words: best iPod ever.

I love it. I'm actually considering selling my 60GB iPod. It's flash-based, so it is fast. It's super light and small. The plug on the bottom isn't weird like I thought it'd be. If I drop the iPod nano, it hangs nicely from the earphone cable without pulling free. It fits nicely in my shirt pocket.

iPod nano in jeansIt doesn't fit as neatly in the little jean pocket that Steve Jobs' intro to the unit indicated. It's too tall to fit straight down, and with the earphones plugged in, it won't fit fully in sideways. Nevertheless, the thing is so small you won't have any difficulty whatsoever finding a place to tuck it away. Also, it feels pretty solid. One of my complaints about the iPod shuffle was how light and plastic it felt. Walt Mossberg was right: this feels just right. Nice and solid with just enough weight. I think I could skip this sucker pretty nicely across the face of a lake.

More after the jump...

ipod nano sales bagHere's a pic of the illustrious bag it comes in if you buy one from the Apple Store (previously mentioned by Dave in his hands-on review). It's a rather stiff bag, but if I can figure out how to ship it, I'll include the bag with the white 2GB iPod nano I bought to send to the winner of our contest. If not, maybe I'll auction it off to the suckers on ebay.

The black picks up fingerprints like you wouldn't believe and I've already put a scratch in the front, but honestly, I don't care. I've never been squeamish about scratches on my iPods. I bought this for its size and functionality. It delivers nicely in both areas. The USB only file transfer is a bit of a drag, and I don't think the file transfer is nearly as fast as Christopher Breen's review seems to indicate. It took quite some time for the iPod nano to get the 500 songs I chose to cram on it transfered over alongside all the photos I chose to transfer. That being said, the performance of the iPod nano when it is not connected to a computer is amazing. It flies through the interface and displays the photos much faster than my 60GB iPod does. The screen is great. Bright and clear. The only negative I can say about the screen is that the Notes font is more than a bit small on the nano's small screen and will most likely not make it an attractive choice for people with bifocals. Apple should release a firmware update that adds a preference to toggle the font size from miniscule to mega-big.

The sound is great. The iPod is great. Get one. Try to win one. I'll add more bits later.

Categories

iPod Family Reviews

I've had my iPod nano in hand (and large ogre-like hands if the picture with this post is any indicator) now for 24 hours. Three words:...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

28 Comments

Filter by:
PeteC

Georg mate, sort it out! If the headphones are what stopping you buying a black one there is two things you should consider. Firstly, the phones the ipod ship with are pretty crap, anyone willing to pay so much money for a music player and not putting a bit aside for a decent set of headphones is a bit silly. Secondly, almost all other headphones out there are black so will go nicely with the black nano. People won't be able to tell you're listening to an iPod by using them too unless of course you want everyone out there to know you're a nano owner in which case you're a big show off and need to get a life!!! :-P Nano looks very cool though, if only they'd get the damn thing to play OGG files I think I'd be tempted over to the dark side of Apple.

September 13 2005 at 6:42 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
moe

I... I can't. I can't read this anymore. Please stop. my 4GB Black nano hasn't arrived yet.

September 11 2005 at 2:06 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Voxel

Ehm Georg... You don't get it? iPod = White headphones, didn't you see the ads? Don't you see people everywhere with those white earbuds and wires that just scream iPod? The pink mini didn't come with pink headphones and people didn't complain about it. The PSP is black and comes with white earbuds. Anyway even if the iPod headphones are above average compared to what you get when you buy other music players, you could buy better headphones, in black for $25 if you really want them to match. Anyway it's not like the iPod nano was red and the earbuds green... Black and white are perfect complements, does a piano look ridiculous?

September 10 2005 at 1:42 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Ben

Would it be worth it to replace my 20GB 3rd generation iPod and my 512mb shuffle w/ one of these? I wonder how much those two would garner on eBay... :)

September 10 2005 at 12:09 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Chris Breen

C.K. Got it. If you try it again you'll find that it's much faster. The very first time you sync the nano for photo use, iTunes optimizes the photos for display on it and this does take a long time. But it's a one-time thing. Once photos are optimized, they don't need to be optimized again (when you add new photos they'll need to be optimized, however). So the results I got were based on a sync where the photos were already optimized.

September 10 2005 at 10:51 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
david

Forget about FireWire syncing, it isn't going to speed things up all that much. The bottleneck isn't USB it is the flash memory.

September 10 2005 at 10:01 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
C.K. Sample, III

Hey, Chris, I didn't do as scientific studies as you did with a race and timed iPods, so maybe my impatience was getting the best of me; however, I chose to manually sync, and dragged songs over simultaneously with the first migration of all my photos. It took well over 15 minutes, but this was cramming a LOT of photos in there (wedding and honeymoon and another vacation), and the photos seemed to be the real time-suck of the procedure.

September 10 2005 at 9:23 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Josh

Darran, where is your companys Job Application form? ;) I like the look of the black.. but I have a black Rio Nitrus, and fingerprints show up on it bigtime.. so I think I'll probably get the white. Still deciding though :P Josh

September 10 2005 at 9:00 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Georg

Thanks for your quick review. I haven't seen one yet live, so the evaluation of those lucky few who possess one is helpful. From the pictures I saw the nano looks like the best iPod Apple has ever produced, but I had my doubts regarding the "feel" of it, I was afraid it would not live up to the quality of the large iPods, good to know that it doesn't have the flimsy plastic feeling of the shuffles. Not sad of the passing of the iPod minis, they never seemed to strike a chord with me, too colorful and a bit bulky. The only thing that bothers me about the nano is that the black edition, which I find most attractive, comes with white earphones and accessories. Why? Looks ridiculous. Can it be that expensive for Apple to produce black earphones, I don't get it. That's the only thing keeping me from ordering one now.

September 10 2005 at 8:32 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Galley

That jeans pocket is actually called a watch pocket. They date back to the time when men wore pocket watches. Jeans are more than 100 years old after all. I think the ones Steve Jobs was wearing Had an unusually deep pocket.

September 10 2005 at 8:20 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.