Filed under: iPod Family, iPhone, iPad
Don't trust the critics: Four Apple products they thought would fail
What did the critics have to say about these four "failed" Apple products when they first debuted, and which products were they? Click "Read More" to find out.
1. The Mac
It seems absurd now, but there was a time when some critics thought the Mac would be a complete failure. They considered the mouse-driven interface "Useless." Ponder that one for a bit. "Awkward," "Not easy to learn," and of course, "Costs too much" were other 1984-era complaints leveled at Apple's latest creation. These critics were used to the keyboard-driven interface of DOS-running PCs, and from the sounds of things, they considered the Mac, with its graphic user interface and "awkward" mouse, to be nothing more than an overpriced novelty, doomed to fail.
I hardly need to tell you what happened next. The original Macintosh completely revolutionized the computer industry. Within only a short time, companies like Microsoft scrambled to duplicate the GUI/mouse combo the Mac brought to the market. Today, nearly every desktop, notebook, and netbook out there runs a GUI/mouse interface. And 26 years after the first Macintosh debuted, Apple still sells Macs by the millions every year. I wish I could fail half as hard as that.
2. The iMac
"No floppy drive?!?" was the echoing cry among the tech world in 1998. Add to that the iMac's hermetically-sealed case and not particularly upgrade-friendly components, and once again, tech critics and build-it-yourself users who had been used to beige towers predicted the iMac would never catch on. Instead, the iMac sold like crazy and almost instantaneously doubled Apple's PC marketshare. Twelve years later, the iMac is still Apple's best-selling desktop, and it shows no signs of going anywhere anytime soon... unlike those floppy disks everyone once thought were so crucial.
3. The iPod
One of the greatest things about the internet is that in a way, it's the closest any of us will get to time travel. Let's go back to October 23, 2001, and get Slashdot's now-famous opinion of the just-announced iPod: "No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame."
The comments that follow are even better. "I don't see many sales in the future of iPod." "All I can say is, as an Apple 'fan', I'm sad." But don't just take Slashdot's word for it. The forum folks at MacRumors had some true gems too: "Great just what the world needs, another freaking MP3 player." "I still can't believe this! All this hype for something so ridiculous! Who cares about an MP3 player?" "'I'd call it the Cube 2.0 as it wont sell, and be killed off in a short time...and it's not really functional." "The Reality Distiortion Field™ is starting to warp Steve's mind if he thinks for one second that this thing is gonna take off." "Not exactly 'revolutionary'. " "The real money is in DRM and distribution (ala Real Musicnet). If Apple were smart they would be focusing on high gross revenue from services rather than a playback device." "It is by no means revolutionary or groundbreaking. It is an MP3 player. BFD. It is just a step in the evolution of an MP3 player [...] Think different is dead."
It goes on like that, for pages and pages. And this is at a site full of Apple fans, the majority of whom were unimpressed with the iPod at best and thought it was Apple's death knell at worst. People who weren't great fans of Apple at the time, like the guys behind Penny Arcade, had even harsher things to say about the iPod, even two years after its release (not safe for work language -- it is Penny Arcade, after all). Over nine years later, where are we? Over a quarter of a billion iPods have been sold since then, and it's largely due to the iPod's momentum that Apple has become the phenomenal success it is today.
4. The iPhone
For the first half of 2007, before the iPhone actually hit stores, people either thought it was the greatest innovation of the past ten years (at least) or an overpriced, overhyped device that lacked features common to many other phones. Of course, there was no lack of punditry from those who thought the iPhone was doomed, and Apple right along with it. Tech critic John Dvorak said of the iPhone, "I'd advise people to cover their eyes. You are not going to like what you'll see." A former CEO of Palm said, "We've learned and struggled for a few years here figuring out how to make a decent phone. PC guys are not going to just figure this out. They're not going to just walk in." And who could forget Steve Ballmer of Microsoft, perhaps the best-remembered critic of the iPhone: "There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance." Ballmer claimed Apple would be lucky to get 2-3% cellphone marketshare.
Over 42 million iPhones later, Apple has become the largest mobile device company in the world. And whether you agree that HTC and other phone manufacturers have violated Apple's patents or not, the influence the iPhone has had on the smartphone industry is undeniable. Before June of 2007, almost all smartphones looked like clones of the Blackberry. Less than three years later, an awful lot of smartphones now look like clones of the iPhone instead.
With these four products, Apple drove the evolution of three industries: PCs, portable media players, and smartphones. All four products were smashing successes despite all the doom and gloom from both professional and armchair tech critics. Now, with the introduction of the iPad, Apple is aiming at a new industry: ultraportable computers. For the past month and a half, at least half of everyone paying attention to the iPad has laughed at it, pointed out its shortcomings, and predicted its failure. My prediction? A year from now, we're going to have a very long list of misguided iPad quotes to point and laugh at.



![TUAW [Cafepress]](http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.tuaw.com/media/tuaw-cafepress-promo.png)


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 6)
Markus said 10:17AM on 3-10-2010
There is a small collection of those statements concerning the iPhone here:
http://aaplinvestors.net/stats/iphone/iphonedeathwatch/
Some are really funny! :)
Reply
Manu said 11:41AM on 3-10-2010
In the same vein I have collected quotes which ridicules apple and apple products
http://www.manu-j.com/blog/apple-naysayers.html
For ex: What would i do? i'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders - Michael Dell - October 6, 1997
Iljajj said 2:48AM on 3-22-2010
Manu, don't forget just how deep in the schtuck Apple was in '97, with no coherent management, no appealing product in its line-up and a pretty negligible market share. At the time, Dell's comments were hardly unjustified.
reader1 said 10:19AM on 3-10-2010
The early comments about the Wii are just as funny:
"...it's not looking like a home run for Nintendo marketing."
- Paul Miller, Engadget
http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/27/wii-know-wii-feel-the-same-way/
http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/27/nintendo-wii-the-revolution-gets-a-real-name/
http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/15/the-nintendo-revolution-controller-no-really/
Judging by the negative comments about the iPad, it's going to sell extremely well.
Reply
Lorin.Necula said 7:07PM on 3-10-2010
Great article. It really shows how narrow-minded and stubborn people can be. I can't wait for the iPad and I know the 2nd Gen will be much better so I will be buying that one too. I know Im going to love it and so does Apple. It's like when I first got my iPhone and all my friends thought I was crazy but one by one they all converted. (kinda wish had my great bandwidth back though)
Reply
hansning said 10:30AM on 3-10-2010
What about the apple products that didn't succeed? 20th anniversary Mac, Cube, Apple TV, Newton to name a few. Some aren't exactly failures, but Apple is far from bulletproof.
I do believe that the iPad will succeed though. And I for one am happy that it doesn't do Flash.
Reply
Aaron said 10:41AM on 3-10-2010
Uhm, what? The 20th Anniversary Mac? That was a limited run build on purpose.
Joshua Ochs said 10:45AM on 3-10-2010
Well, the 20th Anniversary Mac was a fiasco of hubris. A computer that wasn't even top of the line (it was a 603e, whereas many other Macs were 604e's at that point) and it cost $10,000. For a company that was not in good shape at the time, it was a colossal blunder. Gil Amelio may have done some good housecleaning and did a great thing in buying NeXT, but he was no product visionary.
Newton - a product ahead of its time from the Sculley years. Honestly, I see the iPad as the anti-Newton. Apple certainly could have released a tablet 6-8 years ago when the first tablet PC's came out (they already had Ink on Mac OS X), but instead they held back and avoided a half-baked product.
Which brings us to the Cube - probably the reason Apple was smarting and didn't bring out another half-baked product. ;-)
AppleTV is debatable - it's certainly a curious little box for today's Apple. It's clearly not living up to its potential, and seems to get even less attention than Mac Mini updates. I've always found this strange given Apple's large media aspirations and iTunes success.
I'm personally in the camp that thinks the iPad is the herald of a New Big Thing for Apple, but much like the original iPod and iPhone it still needs to simmer for another generation or two. I'll probably own one at some point, just not these models.
lancelott said 12:38PM on 3-10-2010
I agree with Joshua up there... 20th Anniversary doesn't count as it was a novelty item and Steve Jobs wasn't around...
In fact, the only product that has really "failed" during Jobs tenure is the Cube.
The Apple TV... I would be careful to call it a failure for two reasons:
1. Apple hasn't invested much in advertising it and pushing it like they did with the iPhone/iPad. Maybe the current succes (or lack thereof) of the Apple TV was intended or expected because...
2. It's more or less a test product for Apple TV. I think this "hobby" device is really here in order for Apple to experiment with some things... Learning their way through the TV Networks, delivery of this type of content, etc... All the lessons they learn from this will help Apple for once- determine if they go after this market and second HOW to do it and not do it.
Bruno said 1:22PM on 3-10-2010
You're forgetting the iPod Hifi... Overpriced, limited, designed for Steve only, just like the iPad ;-)
The Mac, the iPhone and the iPod are huge successes though...
Joey said 2:16PM on 3-10-2010
@lancelott
I think it's perfectly fair to call Apple TV a failure. I once owned two myself (in fact I've owned just about every failure on the list except for the TAM) and by all accounts the Apple TV is a sub par product.
This would be forgivable if Windows Media Center wasn't a superior solution in every way. MCE's features are more robust (DVR, Netflix, Internet TV are all built in), it's extensible, it supports far more codecs and even the interface beats the ATV. MCE 7 is simply gorgeous.
Of course to be fair, the Apple TV is a calculated failure. Apple could fix it, but they refuse to. This is because they want us in their ecosystem and niceties like Hulu, Netflix or even recorded TV break this paradigm. In short, the Apple TV is meant to be a big iPod for your TV and nothing more.
gleocata0422 said 4:29PM on 3-10-2010
The 20th century Mac also cost $10,000.
hansning said 4:36PM on 3-10-2010
Lemme take back the word failures. Let's just say they weren't exactly successes.
TAM may be limited, but it was ridiculous nonetheless.
iGlad said 7:10PM on 3-10-2010
20th anniversary Mac that's the one left o/s in my collection it still looks like a work of art despite it all
Rob said 2:52PM on 3-23-2010
I don't think the ATV is a failure, it's just a device with a limited appeal. As far as MCE PCs being a better solution, point me to the MCE which is
Jay said 10:40AM on 3-10-2010
Feels like every time a new product is announced there are people who find joy in stomping all over it, and when the product is finally released and is a huge success, they find joy in talking about how everyone is stupid for using it. Trolls will be trolls.
Reply
Jordan said 10:42AM on 3-10-2010
Well it's not released yet, but I'll gladly tell people how stupid they are for wanting to use it. It's the same product released for the third time....pointless.
Joshua Ochs said 10:53AM on 3-10-2010
@Jordan
And, another person who Just Doesn't Get It. I find it fascinating that so far anyone who has used one gushes about how "this is not a big iPod Touch", and everyone who hasn't used one complains "it's just a big iPod Touch".
http://stevenf.tumblr.com/post/359224392/i-need-to-talk-to-you-about-computers-ive-been
http://speirs.org/blog/2010/1/29/future-shock.html
http://camerondaigle.com/v1/articles/podcamp_nashville_2010_presentation/
Gib said 10:58AM on 3-10-2010
@ Jordan
Just because Jay said "Trolls will be trolls" doesn't mean he wanted you to make an appearance. Will you please stop commenting on Apple blogs if you have nothing to say but the same rehashed comments like that. They always seem... pointless.
Troy said 10:59AM on 3-10-2010
I guess I will assume you are referring to the iPod Touch and the iPhone as the first 2 devices which make the iPad "pointless".. Apparently you did not even read any of this article or the link the first comment. You sound just like all those people who called the iPhone and the people who want it stupid. But I guess I should not feed the troll.. too late I guess..