Skip to Content

How the Mac survived the recession

As we approach 2010's halfway point, it's interesting to reflect on Apple's successful navigation of the American economy's recession. With some careful inspection, we realize that Apple's portfolio of non-Macs saw it through.

Philip Elmer-DeWitt at Apple 2.0 has published a chart demonstrating unit sales of Macs vs PCs over the last nine years. While the industry suffered as a whole, as did so many others, Apple sold more Macs in that span. You'll notice an off-the-chart dip in 2005-2006, which coincides with the Intel transition; a time when many users stopped buying as they waited for the new machines (The first Intel iMacs were released in January 2006).

During that waiting period, Apple relied on iPod sales. By the time iPod sales slowed, shoppers were buying Macs again. Likewise, as the current recession prevented many customers from buying Macs, the iPhone sustained Apple. It will be interesting to see what the iPad has done in another year.

The Mac Observer's Alexis W. Cabot has his own interpretation of this data. "Macs have been on a roll ever since I have comparable data, with an exception during the [2005-2006] Intel transition," he says. "This proves either that value is always in high demand, or that we will always have the rich among us."

Categories

Apple Financial

As we approach 2010's halfway point, it's interesting to reflect on Apple's successful navigation of the American economy's recession. With...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

7 Comments

Filter by:
balls

Once again, TUAW fails at critical thinking. That chart is based on percentages sold, not total numbers. If you sell 100 macs in 2006, then sell 200 macs in 2007, you've increased sales by 100%, but still only sold 200 total macs.

Windows has 91% market share compared to Mac OS X 5% (http://marketshare.hitslink.com/Default.aspx via https://ssl.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/nbbw.cgi?Gw=Mac%20OS%20vs%20Windows%20market%20share)

Apple's surgance into a dominant tech company has very little to do with their computers, and instead everything to do with ipods, iphones, and itunes.

April 24 2010 at 6:12 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
steve@delebrum.com

The recession is over?

April 24 2010 at 2:17 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to steve@delebrum.com's comment
Jarrodkrug

Yeah, did I miss something? Was their an announcement....

April 24 2010 at 11:00 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ben

$999 for a well build laptop is not cheap, but it's hardly a luxury for the "rich".

April 23 2010 at 3:55 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Urbz

My goodness... does it really take a "rich person" to buy a Mac? I know they aren't the cheapest computers in the market, but that's kind of extreme.
While I understand it's purely anecdotal, all the people I know are middle class, and they could all afford a Mac. Some have them.
I would think that other factors are at play here.

April 23 2010 at 3:05 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to Urbz's comment
tcsdoc

It's the typical 'bashing of Apple'. The only thing the competition can use is price. Apple products cost more because of a higher quality in construction and a better operating system. Dell, HP (Compaq), or any of the others cannot match the overall user experience of a Mac so that leaves the price.

April 23 2010 at 3:25 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
balls

@Jordan: The point is, 1 to 1 comparisons, price is not an issue.

If you built a dell with the *exact* same components as an Apple (not functional equivalent components but *exact* matching ones), the price difference will be negligible.

Addon's like RAM, extra HDD's etc are overpriced, but they are just as overpriced by Dell and HP too.

April 24 2010 at 6:15 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Hot Apps on TUAW

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.