Skip to Content

Report: Apple may have paid over $1M in iAd trademark settlement

This is interesting -- a consultant for Apple on the recent "iAd" trademark settlement accidentally disclosed some information about how much the payout was, and apparently it wasn't cheap. Consor says that it helped Innovate Media (the firm which has used the iAd trademark since 2006) pick up "a 7-figure settlement from Apple Computer [sic] in a trademark infringement case." That's probably over a million dollars, which actually sounds low, considering how solid a grip Innovate Media actually had on the mark. But when Apple comes calling, so does the big Apple wallet.

What's interesting about this is that we've seen Apple "ignore" trademarks a few times before, only to pay out with what we'd presume is a large settlement. But we've never actually heard any numbers on this, so Consor's little release shows that Apple has been writing some pretty substantial checks each time the name issue comes around.

Then again, with $51 billion in the bank Apple can afford to not be so picky when it comes to the trademarks on names they don't own.



Categories

Apple iAds

This is interesting -- a consultant for Apple on the recent "iAd" trademark settlement accidentally disclosed some information about how...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

3 Comments

Filter by:
Brett

"That's probably over a million dollars, which actually sounds low... But when Apple comes calling, so does the big Apple wallet."

Two thoughts - first, this sentence doesn't make any sense (it's low, but Apple has a big wallet?). Second, unless they're counting the decimals, it couldn't be LESS than 1 million, it could certainly a lot more. Considering Apple's big wallet, I would guess it was a lot more.

November 02 2010 at 10:11 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Dennis P.

A 7-figure settlement could be anywhere from $1million to $9,999,999.
And although in the article it is implied that this figure is closer to the $1m mark it could be as much as almost 10 times that.

November 02 2010 at 7:38 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mike

If the claim was valid, there seems to be three reasons why this could be true.

Either whoever settled was stupid for taking so little.
Apple was really cunning and smart.
Or both.

November 02 2010 at 7:14 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.