Skip to Content

Judge "likely" to deny Apple's bid to halt Amazon's "appstore" name

Today, at a hearing in Oakland, California, US District Judge Phyllis Hamilton said she will "probably" deny Apple's motion to halt Amazon's use of "app store" in its Android software development program and Android application store. The judge stated that Apple hasn't produced any "real evidence of actual confusion" among potential customers that would be a "stumbling block for Apple," BusinessWeek says.

Apple originally sued Amazon in March over its use of the term "app store." Apple alleged that it violated its trademark and created confusion among customers. A month later, Amazon filed an official response asserting that the term "app store" is generic and is therefore not a valid trademark. Amazon even cited Steve Jobs in its defense, quoting him from an earlier financial conference call where he used "app stores" in a generic sense.

And, for now anyway, it looks like the judge is leaning towards Amazon's defense. Hamilton told Apple, "I'm troubled by the showing that you've made so far, but that's where you're likely not to prevail at this early juncture."

However, Apple could still beef up its case and provide additional evidence in its defense as Hamilton has not yet said when she intends to rule on the case.



Categories

Apple

At a hearing in Oakland, California today, U.S. District Judge Phyllis Hamilton said she will "probably" deny Apple's motion to halt Amazon's use of "app store" in its Android software development program and Android application store.
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

7 Comments

Filter by:
Eridius

This article is confusing and not even self-consistent. The original article cited the term "Appstore", and I believe that's what Amazon is using, and that's what this article is titled, but the contents of this article uses the term "app store". Get it together, guys.

June 23 2011 at 3:52 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Windwalker Oldwolf

Apple has a weak case here. People have been calling applications "apps" for over 10 years years now. This especially goes for software. If you havent heard an application file called an app,then you havent been paying attention.

June 22 2011 at 9:39 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Windwalker Oldwolf's comment
Buzz Mega

The issue is not the word APP. It's the shorthand, easy to roll off the tongue, App-le-ified "App Store, AppStore" trademark-able item that is distinct, novel and alliteratively unique to a company who's name starts with those three letters. If Apple had decided to call it the AmazoStore, you can imagine the squealing from Bezo's office!

June 22 2011 at 10:27 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
YBrammer

Personally, I think Apple has a strong case. I've never heard anyone refer to software as "apps" on Windows or cell phones until the release of iOS. I know that Macs had apps but it was almost exclusively a Mac term. Then after the App Store was released, all the cell phones began to call there software apps.

June 22 2011 at 9:18 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to YBrammer's comment
virtualcrogs

You never heard of the phrase "killer app"? before in terms of console games?

June 22 2011 at 9:41 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to virtualcrogs's comment
Buzz Mega

Killer App will never be confused with "App Store". App Store has no blood.

June 22 2011 at 10:24 PM Report abuse rate up rate down
Buzz Mega

Hey, wait a minute! I thought I could shop for Mac Apps at Amazon and get that good-old Amazon low price! Are you telling me this isn't the case?

June 22 2011 at 8:38 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.