Back to Mobile View

Skip to Content

Walter Isaacson reportedly to expand Jobs biography

Steve Jobs biographer Walter Isaacson spoke recently at a meeting hosted by the Commonwealth Club of California, and said that he very likely will add an addendum to the already 630-page biography of Apple's co-founder. "This is the first or second draft" of the book, he reportedly said. "It's not the final draft."

One obvious place the book could expand, according to Isaacson, is on the period after Jobs' death earlier this year, and the response around the country and the world from nearly everyone associated with Apple. Isaacson also says he's thinking about doing a more annotated version, including more details on the life Jobs shared with Isaacson over the last few years.

Isaacson also talked a little bit about Jobs' input on the book -- he specifically asked to help design the cover, and Isaacson was happy to oblige. And Isaacson says that during all of his research and their talks, the one thing Jobs really wanted him never to speak about was philanthropy; Jobs obviously wanted that part of his life to remain out of the public eye. But that didn't stop him, Isaacson remembers, from poking a little fun at Bill Gates' famous giving: "Bill Gates was better at philanthropy because he didn't care about making great products," Isaacson quotes Jobs as saying to him.



Categories

Apple

Steve Jobs biographer Walter Isaacson spoke recently at a meeting hosted by the Commonwealth Club of California, and said that he very...
 

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

15 Comments

Filter by:
Scott Bruneau

There are those that may be humble and ANONYMOUS in their giving. TRUE giving is to give and let go and not stand around in the limelight of ego for having given. I suspect that despite Jobs reputation for a big ego... like all of us, he had another side. There is an ugliness to trumpeting how great we are as Givers. Every day a stranger will help another and the Other not know their name and the stranger not stand around for applause. They keep on going ... and giving anonymously. This MAY have been the case with Jobs.

December 17 2011 at 9:26 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Jason Topp

I don't understand why people think it is a responsibility of the rich to donate money to charities and such. I am not saying I would not, but why knock someone for not doing so or not bragging about what they did do? It's not like the money isn't tax deductible anyway so I don't know why people are heralding the mega rich givers like they are giving from they own hear 100% because you never know if they are giving from their heart.

Everyone needs to give.

A year ago I meta no,else's person in Detroit who had drug issues etc. I personally convinced him to get treatment and walked him into a rehab where over the last year he has become clean and is trying to get his life back. I filmed the whoe process and made a documentary called "Where there's a will". I'm saying this because people need to know that everyone can give back and help others. You don't need a bazillion dollars to do so either.

December 17 2011 at 3:07 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Seth

I've always thought more of celebrities who keep their charitable donations (or lack thereof) private. I'm glad the book didn't mention much of it. Those that do talk about their charitable donations, It seems like grandstanding, and showing excessive pride in your wealth. It's pointless.

December 17 2011 at 9:46 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Seth's comment
SLBear

Steve Jobs made it a point to tell his belief, not a slip of the lip. In the book he said "He did not believe in Philanthropy" or giving to charity."Unlike Bill Gates".
Bill and Melinda have done much more than give money, they visit with and put an end to malaria, aids and other horrible diseases for 3rd world countries. Money, BTW, since it's on everybody's mind.
Bill Gates is no longer the country's (or worlds) richest person. Because he gave half his money away.
Bill Gates is much more of a Buddhist than Steve Jobs. As much as one wants to believe he never reached 'nirvana" in this life.
I don't like Microsoft and never will but Gates deserves every bit of respect given him. Jobs, lets just say is a model Right Wing Republican.
It matters little what he thinks of himself.

December 18 2011 at 6:55 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
oZ

Walter Isaacson reportedly would like more money, if at all possible.

December 17 2011 at 12:33 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to oZ's comment
Ian MacFarlane

That was the first thing that I noticed.

"This is the first or second draft" of the book, he reportedly said. "It's not the final draft."

That's cool, man. He obviously picked something up from Jobs. If you release a product with missing features, you can incorporate those missing features in the next iteration, selling two products instead of one.

December 19 2011 at 3:48 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Ian MacFarlane's comment
Shannon Doherty

Actually, the book was supposed to be released in 2012 sometime, I think. They pushed it up due to Jobs' death. So it's entirely conceivable that it's not truly finished in the way Isaacson envisioned. Not to mention that there's always additions that can be added in detail or a proper epilogue. Your derision is immature, at best.

December 19 2011 at 3:53 PM Report abuse rate up rate down
Eideard

And - CM70 - you have something beyond strawman conjecture upon which to found your crap choices?

You offer nothing more than, say, some bible-thumping moneygrubber asking - will you accept Jeebus or spend the rest of your life living in sin?

December 17 2011 at 12:13 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Eideard's comment
CM70

Eldeard, do you have anything to add beyond name-calling?
Your comment adds nothing to the discussion.

I made it very clear in my post that it was conjecture. I DON'T KNOW what Jobs did, but I HOPED we would find out. Evidence from many reporters leans towards the fact that Jobs has never given significant amounts of money to any charity (and his condescending attitude towards the philanthropy work done by Bill Gates). BUT WE DON'T KNOW. I think that if Jobs did give to charity, he's actually hurting his legacy and the act of charity in general by not acknowledging any of his contributions.

I also don't know where you get the religious angle - I'm speaking purely as a human on this planet who sees a lot of greed and destruction done by corporations and I think these mega-rich CEOs have an obligation to give something back to their country as any good American patriot should.

December 17 2011 at 2:46 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
CM70

"Jobs really wanted him never to speak about was philanthropy; Jobs obviously wanted that part of his life to remain out of the public eye. "

Is this because he didn't want people second-guessing his charity choices, or was it because Jobs was embarrassed about his selfishness and unwillingness to give to charities? I would really like to know.

When Jobs died, I sincerely hoped that we would get a story telling us about all the money he left to charities to help combat global warming or famine or perhaps cancer research. However, now I think that Jobs probably just left all his money to his family instead - which I guess might be expected of a person who seemed to treat most people as his inferior.

Yes, Jobs did a lot of good for the world with his devices and business savvy, but he also owed a debt to the American people and the country he lived in for creating a situation where he could succeed.

December 16 2011 at 9:46 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to CM70's comment
thanatos

In what way did Steve Jobs owe anyone a debt?

I don't recall loaning him a dime. He got rich by elevating others to their true potential and selling products. Most of his fortune came from his sale of Pixar to Disney and up until he died, most of his worth was tied up in stocks and bonds.

Also, there's no way of knowing whether or not he made charitable donations unless HE chose to divulge that information. Considering that he was private about every other aspect of his life, it makes sense that he wouldn't discuss that as well. Not to mention that some people really find it morally repugnant to boast or brag about charitable donations that have been made. There's a good chance that he's one of those people.

December 17 2011 at 9:34 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
4 replies to thanatos's comment
Buy an ad here

Tweets

© 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.